期刊文献+

中医药应用SCI期刊分区评价存在的问题与拟解决办法 被引量:3

Problems Existing in The Regional Evaluation of Sci Journals in Application of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Their Solutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合中医药学术期刊"读者/受众少"、"传播范围有限"、"理论创新类论文发表时滞、出版周期以及被引半衰期较长"、"影响力难以评价"等特点,探析SCI期刊分区方法在中医药领域应用存在的问题,并提出若干解决办法。如坚持"同类相聚,同级相比"基本原则,放弃以大类学科为单位进行期刊分区的做法,至少在二级学科分类基础上进行分区;个别领域根据"20种期刊分区原则"进行单独划分;根据不同学科文献类型的实际特点,采用适宜的科学计量学指标进行期刊评价;根据不同学科期刊数量,适当调整分区比例等。 Combining the characteristics of "few readers/audiences","limited scope of dissemination","time lag in publication of theoretical innovation papers,publication cycle and long cited half-life,"and "difficulty in evaluating influence"in academic journals of traditional Chinese medicine,the problems existing in the application of Science Citation Index (SCI)periodical zoning methods in the field of traditional Chinese medicine are explored,and several solutions are proposed.For example,we shall adhere to the basic principle of "meeting in the same category and comparing the same level",abandon the practice of dividing periodicals by major disciplines,and at least divide the periodicals on the basis of the classification of secondary disciplines;individual fields shall be separately divided according to the principle of "20 kinds of periodicals",appropriate scientific metrology indexes shall be used for journal evaluation based on the actual characteristics of the types of documents in different disciplines;the proportion of subdivision shall be adjusted based on the number of journals in different disciplines.
作者 王传池 胡镜清 江丽杰 Wang Chuanchi;Hu Jingqing;Jiang Lijie(School of Preclinical Medicine of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine,Wuhan 430065,China;Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,China)
出处 《世界科学技术-中医药现代化》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期1098-1102,共5页 Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Medica-World Science and Technology
基金 国家中医药管理局委托项目(GZY-KJS-2017-20):落实卫生健康大会精神重点研究--建立健全适合中医药发展的评价体系研究 负责人:胡镜清
关键词 中医药 学术期刊 分区 评价 Traditional Chinese medicine academic journal subdivision evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1Archambault E, Lariviere V. History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences [J]. Scientometrics,2009,79(3) : 635 -649.
  • 2Glanzel W, Moed H F. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2002,53(2) : 171 - 193.
  • 3Della Sala S, Crawford J R. Impact factor as we know it handicaps neuropsychology and neuropsychologists [ J]. Cortex, 2006,42( 1 ) :1 -2.
  • 4Hirsch J. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output [ J ]. PNAS, 2005, 102 (46) :16569 - 16572.
  • 5Braun T, Glanzel W, Schubert A. A Hirseh-type index for journals [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69 (1) : 169 -173.
  • 6Butler D. Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market[ J]. Nature ,2008,451 (7174) :6.
  • 7Della Sala S, Grafman J. Five-year impact factor [J]. Cortex,2009,45(8) :911.
  • 8Jacso P. Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports [ J ]. Online information review,2009, 33(3) :603 -614.
  • 9赵星,高小强,唐宇.SJR与影响因子、h指数的比较及SJR的扩展设想[J].大学图书馆学报,2009,27(2):80-84. 被引量:46
  • 10任胜利.特征因子(Eigenfactor):基于引证网络分析期刊和论文的重要性[J].中国科技期刊研究,2009,20(3):415-418. 被引量:107

共引文献43

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部