摘要
公证作为一种事前风险防范机制,在预防纠纷、减少诉讼方面具有独特的制度价值。公司是市场经济中的重要商事活动主体,其重大经济行为是否规范有序,不仅影响着公司内部成员的合法权益,还对与公司交易的不特定第三人的交易安全构成影响。目前,我国公证制度介入公司实务遭遇现实困难、公司法领域里强制公证的立法缺失以及现有公证立法与公司立法不协调等问题都阻碍了公证在公司活动领域预防纠纷的制度功能的有效发挥。因此,在公司法中引入公证规则,能够充分发挥公证预防纠纷、维护市场主体交易安全的作用。在公司立法中应区分强制公证和任意公证的公司事项,并具体列明二者的适用范围。
As an ex ante risk prevention mechanism,notarization has unique value in preventing disputes and reducing litigation.A company is an important business entity in the market economy.Whether its major economic behavior is regulated or not will not only affect the (legitimate rights and interests of its members,but also affect the transaction safety of the third party that is not specific to the company's transactions.At present,our country's notary practical difficulties,the lack of legislation of compulsory notarization in the field of company law,and the current notarization legislation of our country is not harmonious with the legislation of the company,have hindered the effective function of notarization in the system of preventing disputes in the field of corporate activities.Therefore,the construction of notarization rules in the company law, which aims to play a role in the prevention of disputes and safeguard the security of market transactions.In the legislation of the company,the company matters of compulsory notarization and arbitrary notarization should be distinguished,and the scope of application of the two parties shall be specified,respectively.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第12期131-140,共10页
Law Science Magazine
关键词
公证员
公司事项公证
公司法
notary
company affairs notarization
company law