摘要
援引诉讼时效抗辩权的行为性质属行使权利之表意行为,但在诉讼外、诉讼程序中和执行程序中具有不同的法律意义,适用不同的法律规则。对于诉讼外援引行为,我国应采"双重性质说"。对于诉讼程序不同阶段中的援引行为,应结合诉讼程序的制度价值、举证规则的要求、与其他制度的衔接等因素,认定该援引行为的效力。执行时效具有贯彻既判力等特殊制度价值,执行程序中的援引行为宜采用债务人异议之诉制度予以实现。
The nature of invoking the right of defence of extinctive prescription is ideographic act of exercising the right,which has different legal meanings outside the litigation、in the litigation and execution procedure.Thus it should apply different legal rules.For the act of invoking outside the litigation,our country should adopt the dual nature theory.And for the act of invoking in different stages of litigation procedure,the effect of the invoking act should be determined according to the system value of the proceedings,the requirements of the rules of proof,the connection with other systems and so on.The prescription of execution has special system values such as carrying out res judicata.The act of invoking in the execution procedure should be realized by the debtor’s objection suit system.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期82-90,共9页
Law Review
基金
2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心"(教技函[2013]26号)
中国法学会2017年度部级课题"诉讼时效与仲裁时效衔接及体系化研究"(CLS[2017]D73)的阶段性成果
关键词
诉讼时效抗辩权
援引行为
诉讼程序
执行程序
the Right of Defence of Limitation of Action
Invoking Act
Litigation Procedure
Execution Procedure