期刊文献+

2年生甜樱桃苗木质量综合评价研究 被引量:5

A comprehensive evaluation of the quality of two-year-old sweet cherry seedlings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】筛选评价2 a(年)生甜樱桃苗木质量的关键指标,为甜樱桃苗木质量分级提供依据。【方法】通过对4种砧木、12个规格的甜樱桃苗木主要形态指标和生理指标的比较分析,并结合苗木定植初期成活率和生长量情况,综合评价不同砧木和不同规格的甜樱桃苗木质量。【结果】苗木粗度与苗木高度2个指标密切相关,不同苗木高度、粗度、根砧长度、根系长度、表面积、平均直径、根系体积和根尖数均存在一定差异。经因子载荷阵矩分析,第1因子主要由根系活力、根系体积、根系表面积、根尖数、苗木粗度、根系长度和苗木高度这7个变量决定,其作用载荷分别为0.965、0.924、0.907、0.894、0.849、0.817和0.816,且均呈正相关。【结论】影响2 a生甜樱桃苗木质量的关键指标包括根系活力、根系体积、根系表面积、根尖数、苗木粗度、根系长度和苗木高度。定植当年甜樱桃苗木生长量和成活率与苗木质量密切相关。 [Objective]The purpose of this study was to determine the key quality indexes of two-yearold sweet cherry seedlings with different scion-rootstock combinations,including 8 morphological indexes and 18 physiological indexes,in order to provide the references for quality classification sweet cherry seedlings.[Methods]Four rootstock-scion combinations were used as the materials in this research.The scion varieties were'Meizao'grafted on rootstocks of'Daqingye''Yingzhenwang' 'Gisela 6'and'Colt'.The 26 morphological and physiological indexes of the sweet cherry seedlings were analyzed and compared.The survival rate and growth of seedlings at the early stage of planting were also recorded.According to these data,we evaluated the comprehensive quality of the seedlings using principal components analysis.[Results]There were some differences in seedling height,seedling diameter and rootstock length.The seedling height and seedling diameter of'Gisela 6'and'Daqingye'were more than 180 cm and 1.85 cm,respectively.The rootstock length of'Daqingye'and'Yingzhenwang'were 11.55-15.91 cm;'Gisela 6'rootstock length was 9.00-10.20 cm;'Colt'7.36-8.19 cm.There were some differences in root length,root surface area,average diameter,root volume and root tip number.The root length of'Daqingye'grade I was 1 067.2 cm;'Gisela 6'grade I root surface area,root volume and root tip number were the largest,being 682.2 cm2 ,47.6 cm3 and 4 141.7,respectively.The average root diameter of'Yingzhenwang'grade Ⅰ was 2.9 mm.There were some differenes in stem water content and root water content.Water content in the stem of'Daqingye','Yingzhenwang'and'Colt'were higher than in the root.The stem water content of the same rootstock was in a descending order of grade Ⅰ> grade Ⅱ> grade Ⅲ.There was no significant difference in root water content among different grades.The difference in the content of nitrogen in the stem and the root of different grades was not significant,but stem had a significantly lower nitrogen content than the root.The phosphorus content in the stem and root of the four rootstocks decreased significantly from grade I to grade III.The content of phosphorus in the stem was significantly lower than in the root.At 120 days of storage,the root activity of the four rootstocks,grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ significantly reduced compared to day 0.Among them,the root activity of the'Gisela 6'grade I seedlings was 158.6 μg·g-1·h-1 and the highest,and it maintained the highest at 120 days of storage.After 120 days of storage,the root activity of'Yingzhenwang'seedlings decreased greatly,and the decrease in grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ seedlings was all above 70%.Soluble sugar content in the stem was higher than that of the root,while the starch content in the root was higher than in the stem.Soluble sugar content in the stem and the starch content in the stem and root followed a decreasing order of grade Ⅰ>grade Ⅱ>grade Ⅲ within the same rootstock.Principal component analysis was applied to evaluate the comprehensive quality of the 12 grades of cherry seedlings.The contribution rates of the first 5 principal components were 42.583%,17.487%,15.362% ,8.599% and 6.113% ,respectively,and the cumulative contribution rate reached 90.145% .PRIN 1 was mainly determined by 7 variables,including root activity,root volume,root surface area,root tip number,seedling diameter,root length and seedling height.The load values were 0.965,0.924,0.907,0.894,0.849,0.817 and 0.816,respectively,and all of them were positively correlated with seedlings quality.Factor analysis,principal component analysis and regression method can reflect the quality of different grades of the cherry seedlings from many aspects.The quality rank order of the cherry seedlings was'Gisela 6'grade Ⅰ,'Daqingye'grade Ⅰ,'Yingzhenwang'grade Ⅰ,'Gisela 6'grade Ⅱ',Colt'grade Ⅰ',Yingzhenwang'grade Ⅱ',Daqingye'grade Ⅱ',Gisela 6'grade Ⅲ',Yingzhenwang'grade Ⅲ,'Daqingye'grade Ⅲ,'Colt'grade Ⅱ,and'Colt'grade Ⅲ.30 days after the seedlings were planted,the survival rate of grade Ⅰ seedlings was above 92%,of which the highest survival rate of 100% was found in'Gisela 6'grade Ⅰ seedlings,while the survival rate of grade Ⅲ seedlings was below 90%,of which the lowest survival rate of'Yingzhenwang'seedlings was 82%.At 210 days after seedlings were planted,there were great differences in the number,length and diameter of the branches.The 3 indexes of the four rootstocks were the best in grade I seedlings.Compared with grade Ⅲ seedlings,the number,length and diameter branches in grade Ⅰ seedlings of'Gisela 6'increased by 150%,50.9% and 166.1% respectively.The number of branched in grade Ⅰ seedlings was higher than that of grade Ⅱ and grade Ⅲ seedlings.The growth of grade Ⅰ and grade Ⅱ seedlings was significantly higher than that of grade Ⅲ[Conclusion]The key indexes of the quality of the two-year-old sweet cherry seedlings included root activity,root volume,root surface area,root tip number,seedling diameter,root length and seedling height.The growth and survival rate of sweet cherry seedlings was closely related to the quality of the seedlings in the first year.
作者 田长平 尹砾 张福兴 张序 李芳东 孙庆田 TIAN Changping;YIN Li;ZHANG Fuxing;ZHANG Xu;LI Fangdong;SUN Qingtian(Yantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yantai 265500, Shandong, China;College of Life Sciences, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, Shandong, China)
出处 《果树学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第12期1500-1508,共9页 Journal of Fruit Science
基金 山东省现代农业产业技术体系果品创新团队(SDAIT-06-02) 烟台市科技发展计划(2015NC037)
关键词 甜樱桃 苗木质量 形态指标 生理指标 Sweet cherry Seedling quality Morphological index Physiological index
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献271

共引文献180

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部