期刊文献+

最低工资与贸易比较优势 被引量:4

Minimum Wage and Comparative Advantage of Trade
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章将最低工资和失业引入H-O理论框架,建立起关于最低工资和国家-行业层面比较优势的一般均衡模型,根据模型结论,最低工资上升将使得劳动密集型产品产出下降和资本密集型产品产出上升。因此,若一国是劳动丰裕国,则最低工资上升将弱化其比较优势;而若一国是资本丰裕国,则最低工资上升将强化其比较优势。利用国家层面最低工资数据和国家-行业层面贸易数据的实证证实了这一结论,实证结果表明,最低工资对出口的影响因国家和产品而异,最低工资上升将促进资本丰裕国家资本密集型产品的出口,抑制资本稀缺国家的劳动密集型产品的出口。 In the literature of neoclassical trade,there is no specific research on the impact of minimum wage on comparative advantage and product export at the state-industry level. In this article,the minimum wage and unemployment will be introduced into H-O theoretical framework to establish a general equilibrium model of minimum wage and comparative advantage at the national level.According to the conclusion reached by the model,the rise of minimum wage will promote the increase of capital intensive products’ output while pull down the labor intensive products’ output. Therefore,and if a country is endowed with labor force,the minimum wage increase could weaken its comparative advantage; and if a country is rich in capital,its comparative advantage will be strengthened through the increase of minimum wage. This conclusion is also confirmed by the empirical results exploiting the national minimum wage data and the trade data at national-product level.
作者 王松 孙楚仁 徐晓辰 Wang Song
出处 《世界经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第12期82-95,133,共15页 World Economy Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“‘一带一路’区域价值链构建与中国产业转型升级研究” 国家社会科学基金重大项目“‘一带一路’区域价值链构建与中国产业转型升级研究”(项目编号:18ZDA039)的资助 国家自然科学基金面上项目“我国城市贸易结构空间分布研究”(项目编号:71273167) 国家自然科学基金重点项目“我国产业集聚演进与新动能培育发展研究”(项目编号:71733001) 上海市教育发展基金会“曙光计划”项目“我国城市比较优势研究”(项目编号:14SG51) 西南财经大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项课题“适宜性制度比较优势研究”(项目编号:JBK1807057)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1梁俊伟.劳动力比较优势、贸易利益与经济增长——基于中国的数据[J].经济科学,2006(4):18-28. 被引量:15
  • 2陈超,姚利民.制造业单位劳动成本的国际比较及其对出口与福利的影响[J].世界经济研究,2007(6):24-29. 被引量:12
  • 3田巍,余淼杰,2011.《企业生产率和企业“走出去”对外直接投资:基于企业层面数据的实证研究》,CTRG工作论文No.2011/015.
  • 4Bernard, Andrew B. , and J. B. Jensen, " Export, Jobs and Wages in U. S. Manufacturing, 1976-1987", Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, 1995, Vol. 137, 67-119.
  • 5Bernard, Andrew B. , and J. B. Jensen, "Why Some Firms Export: Experience, Entry Costs, Spillovers, and Subsidies", mimeo, Yale University, 1997.
  • 6Bernard, Andrew B. , B. , Jensen, and P. Sehott, 2007, " Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms", Review of Economic Studies, 74, 31-66.
  • 7Bhagwati, J. N. , and V. K. Ramaswami, 1963, "Domestic Distortions, Tariffs and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 71, 44-50.
  • 8Brandt, L. , J. Van Biesebrueck, and Y. Zhang, 2012 ," Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction Firm-level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing", Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 97 (2), 339-351.
  • 9Brecher, Ricard A. , 1974a, "Minimum Wage Rates and the Pure Theory of International Trade", Quarterly Journal of Economics, ~ol. 88(1), 98-116.
  • 10Brecher, Richard A. , 1974b, " Optimal Commercial Policy for a Minimum-wage Economy", Journal oflnternational Economics, Vol. 4, 139-149.

共引文献159

同被引文献67

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部