期刊文献+

基于前景理论与PROMETHEE的FMEA风险评估 被引量:7

Risk Assessment of FMEA Based on Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对考虑群体评价一致性和专家心理感知行为影响的失效模式及影响分析风险评估问题,提出了基于前景理论和偏好序结构排序法(PROMETHEE)的风险评估方法。首先,专家团队采用语言变量表征风险因子评价信息,利用直觉模糊熵确定风险因子客观权重;其次,采用灰关联度刻画专家评价与群体评价的一致性,以最大化关联度和极大熵准则构建专家权重优化模型;然后,集成风险因子和专家的主客观权重,获得风险因子及专家的综合权重;再次,运用直觉模糊加权平均算子集结专家评价信息,进而借助前景理论构建反应专家心理感知的前景矩阵;最后,基于PROMETHEE方法确定失效模式风险排序,并利用液晶显示器的案例验证了所提方法的有效性和可行性。 In order to consider the influence of group evaluation consistency and expert psychological perception behavior in risk assessment of failure mode and effect analysis,a method of risk assessment based on prospect theory and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations( PROMETHEE) is proposed.Firstly,linguistic variables are introduced to characterize the risk factor evaluation information,and intuitionistic fuzzy entropy is used to determine the objective weight of risk factors. Secondly,the consistency of expert evaluation and group evaluation is depicted by the grey relation degree,and a optimization model is constructed with the maximum correlation degree and maximum entropy criterion. Thirdly,the subjective and objective weights of risk factors and experts are integrated,and the comprehensive weights of risk factors and experts are obtained.Then,the intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator is used to aggregate the expert evaluation information,and with the help of prospect theory,the prospect matrix of the reaction expert’s psychological perception is constructed. Finally,the PROMETHEE method is applied to determine the risk ranking of failure mode and effect analysis,and the validity and feasibility of the proposed method is verified by a case of liquid crystal display.
作者 朱江洪 李延来 王睿 ZHU Jiang-hong;LI Yan-lai;WANG Rui(School of Transportation and Logistics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China;National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China)
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第12期147-157,共11页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371156) 西南交通大学博士研究生创新基金项目(D-CX201729)
关键词 失效模式及影响分析 灰关联度 前景理论 PROMETHEE failure mode and effect analysis grey relation degree prospect theory PROMETHEE
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1Shih H S, Shyur H J, Lee E S. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007, 45(7): 801-813.
  • 2Yu L, Lai K K. A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decision support[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 51(2): 307-315.
  • 3Pang J F, Liang J Y. Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information[J]. Omega, 2012, 40(3): 294-301.
  • 4Zhou L G, Chen H Y, Liu J P. Generalized weighted exponential proportional aggregation operators and their applications to group decision making[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, 36(9): 4365-4384.
  • 5Yue Z L. Extension of TOPSIS to determine weight of decision maker for group decision making problems with uncertain information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(7): 6343-6350.
  • 6Yue Z L. Application of the projection method to determine weights of decision makers for group decision making[J]. Scientia Iranica, 2012, 19(3): 872-878.
  • 7Chen Z P, Yang W. A new multiple attribute group decision making method in intuitionistic fuzz setting[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35(9): 4424-4437.
  • 8Li D F, Chen G H, Huang Z G. Linear programming method for multiattribute group decision making using IF sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(9): 1591-1609.
  • 9Wei G W. Grey relational analysis method for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(5): 4824-4828.
  • 10Zhang Z, Guo C H. A method for multi-granularity uncertain linguistic group decision making with incomplete weight information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012, 26(2): 111-119.

共引文献60

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部