期刊文献+

不同方法治疗胫骨中下段骨折的效果比较研究 被引量:3

Comparative effectiveness research of different treatment methods on middle and lower tibial fracture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同方法治疗胫骨中下段骨折的临床效果。方法选取2015年10月—2017年10月上饶博爱医院收治的胫骨中下段骨折患者100例,根据治疗方法不同分为C、D组,各50例。将D组分为Dc(n=18)、Dd(n=15)、De(n=17)3个亚组。C组患者接受保守治疗;D组接受手术治疗,其中Dc组接受交锁髓内钉内固定手术治疗,Dd组接受外固定支架固定手术治疗,De组接受钢板螺钉内固定手术治疗。比较两组患者及D组3个亚组骨折愈合率,并观察两组患者并发症发生情况。结果 D组患者骨折愈合率高于C组(P<0.05)。Dc、De组患者骨折愈合率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Dc、De组患者骨折愈合率高于Dd组(P<0.05)。D组患者并发症发生率低于C组(P<0.05)。结论手术治疗胫骨中下段骨折的临床效果优于保守治疗,而交锁髓内钉内固定与钢板螺钉内固定治疗胫骨中下段骨折的临床效果优于外固定支架固定,其并不会损伤骨折端的骨膜与软组织,保证骨折端血供正常,进而促进骨折愈合。 Objective To compare the clinical effect of different treatment methods on middle and lower tibial fracture.Methods A total of 100 cases of patients with middle and lower tibial fracture were selected from October 2015 to October 2017 in Shangrao Pok Oi Hospital according to the different treatment methods,which were divided into C and D groups,50 cases each.D Group was divided into three subgroups:Dc(n=18),Dd(n=15) and De(n=17) group.C Group was received conservative treatment,D group was received surgical treatment,Dc group was received interlocking intramedullary nail fixation,Dd group was received external fixator fixation,De group was received plate and screw fixation.The fracture healing rate were compared between the two groups and three subgroups of group D.The complications of the two groups were observed.Results The fracture healing rate in D group was higher than C group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in fracture healing rate between Dc and De groups(P>0.05).Fracture healing rate of Dc and De groups was higher than Dd group(P<0.05).The incidence rate of complications in D group was lower than C group(P<0.05).ConclusionThe clinical effect of surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment in treating middle and lower tibial fractures,while interlocking intramedullary nail and plate and screw internal fixation are superior to external fixator fixation in the treatment of middle and lower tibial fractures,without periosteum and soft tissue damaging at the fracture end,ensure blood supply at the fracture end,and promote fracture healing.
作者 胡龙涌 徐重阳 HU Long-yong;XU Chong-yang(Shangrao Pok Oi Hospital,Shangrao 334000,China)
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2018年第33期35-37,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
基金 2017年上饶市社会发展领域第二批科技计划项目(20172CKJ34)
关键词 胫骨骨折 愈合 疗效比较研究 Tibial fractures Fracture healing rate Comparative effectiveness research
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

  • 1阮才政,张振辉,黄平.外固定支架固定后胫骨骨折不愈合的治疗[J].临床骨科杂志,2004,7(3):299-300. 被引量:9
  • 2黄何平.骨量下降期成年人骨密度与体质量指数的相关性[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(19):3775-3777. 被引量:7
  • 3于祥云.外固定架固定与内固定对胫骨骨折治疗的比较[J].中国医师进修杂志,2007,30(7):52-53. 被引量:2
  • 4Sirkin M,Sanders R,Dipasquale T,et al.A staged protocol for soft tissue management in the treatment of complex pilon fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2004,18(suppl8):32-38.
  • 5Patterson MJ,Cole JD.Two-staged delayed open reduction and internal fixation of severe pillon fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,1999,13(2):85-91.
  • 6危杰,刘璠,吴新宝,等.骨折治疗的AO原则[M].2版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2010:263-278,624-636.
  • 7胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].3版.北京:人民军医出版社,2005:292.
  • 8张锡纯.医学衷中参西录[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,1997.
  • 9ZELLE BA,BHANDARIM,ESPIRITU M, et al. Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement:a sys- tematic review of 1125 fractures[J]. Orthop Trauma,2006,20 (1) :76-79.
  • 10BEDI A, LE TT, EARUNAKAR MA. Surgical treatment of nonarticular distal tibia fractures[J]. Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2006,14(7) :406-416.

共引文献29

同被引文献29

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部