期刊文献+

默认意义新解:语法-语用互动视角 被引量:5

A New Interpretation of Default Meaning from the Interactive Perspective of Grammar and Pragmatics
原文传递
导出
摘要 默认意义是当今后格赖斯语用学高度关注的话题,而它的生成机制一直备受争议。基于Lewis的语言规约观,本文试图从语用-语法互动的视角论证默认意义的生成依赖于语用规约。规约分语法规约和语用规约:前者使生成默认意义的话语结构必须遵循一定的句法结构规则;后者保证听话人自动地识别默认意义,这二者分工明确。本研究的发现为解释默认意义提供了一个新的理论视角。 Default meaning is a frequently discussed topic nowadays in post-Gricean pragmatics,and views of its generation mechanism are hotly disputed among researchers.Based on Lewis's view of language conventions,the author of this article argues that from the interactive perspective of pragmatics and grammar,pragmatic conventions trigger the generation of default meaning.Conventions fall into grammatical and pragmatic ones,with the former making the generation of default meaning follow certain syntactic rules,whereas the latter ensuring that the hearer automatically re.covers default meaning such a clear division of labor between these two types of conventions may provide a new perspective to the analysis of default meaning.
作者 张延飞 ZHANG Yanfei
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期36-41,144,共7页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"默认意义的语用-句法研究"(项目编号:15BYY173) 山东大学首批青年学者未来计划资助项目(项目编号:2015WLJH06)的阶段性成果
关键词 默认意义 语法 语用 规约 协调平衡 default meaning grammar pragmatics convention coordination equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献31

  • 1徐盛桓.论荷恩的等级关系──新格赖斯会话含意理论系列研究之十[J].外国语,1995,18(1):11-17. 被引量:29
  • 2冉永平.词汇语用学及语用充实[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(5):343-350. 被引量:175
  • 3徐盛桓.常规推理与“格赖斯循环”的消解[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(3):163-170. 被引量:92
  • 4Atlas,J.2005.Logic,Meaning and Conversation[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  • 5Bach,K.1994.Conversational impliciture[J].Mind&Language9:124-162.
  • 6Bach,K.2007.Regressions in pragmatics and(semantics)[A].In N.Burton-Roberts(ed.). Pragmatics[C].Basingstoke:Palgrave,24-44.
  • 7Carston,R.2004.Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature[A].In C.Bianchi(ed.).The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction[C].Stanford:CSLI Publications,65-100.
  • 8Carston,R.2009.The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication[J].International Review of Pragmatics1:35-62.
  • 9Garrett,M.&R.M.Harnish.2007.Experimental pragmatics:Testing for implicitures[J].Pragmatics and Cognition16,1:65-90.
  • 10Garrett,M.&R.M.Harnish.2009.Q-phenomena,I-phenomena and impliciture:Some experimental pragmatics[J].International Review of Pragmatics1:84-117.

共引文献9

同被引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部