期刊文献+

生物活性测定法替代方法验证研究 被引量:1

Research on the verification of alternative methods of biological activity assay
原文传递
导出
摘要 生物活性测定法是测定成分复杂药品活性的一种生物方法,由于其检测体系复杂,影响因素众多,对其进行理化方法替代研究已成为一种趋势。本文在参考国外药典基础上结合本实验室所做研究,对生物活性测定法的替代研究进行了探讨,并提出了替代方法建立与验证以及一致性研究实验设计和统计分析的一些意见。 Biological activity assay is one kind of method which determines the activity of complex drugs. Because of the numerous influencing factors and complex testing system,the replacement of biological activity assay by physicochemical method has become a trend.Based on the foreign pharmacopoeias and the research of our laboratory,we discuss the replacement of biological activity assay in this article and put forword some proposals about the establishment and verification of alternative methods,the design of consistency experiment and statistical analysis.
作者 李震 张媛 高华 LI Zhen;ZHANG Yuan;GAO Hua(National Institutes for Food and Drug Control,Beijing 100050,China)
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第24期2883-2887,共5页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基金 国家"重大新药创制"科技重大专项资助项目(2015ZX09303-001) 国家药典委员会国家药品标准提高研究项目
关键词 生物活性测定法 替代 理化方法 统计分析 biological activity assay replacement physicochemical method statistical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献74

  • 1李湛军,徐康森.低分子肝素生物活性测定方法的比较研究[J].药物分析杂志,2005,25(9):1111-1114. 被引量:5
  • 2张秀明,李炜煊,郑松柏,陈滨鸿,曹永坚,孙蕾,林莲英,柯培锋,马骥.不同检测系统17项常规生化结果的比对和偏倚评估[J].检验医学,2007,22(2):166-170. 被引量:47
  • 3陈卉.Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):308-309. 被引量:216
  • 4National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standar- ds. Method comparison and bias estimation using pa- tient samples [S]. Approved Guideline, Wayne: PA, NCCLS EPg-A2,2002.
  • 5Altman DG, Bland JM. Commentary on quantifying agreement between two methods of measurement[J]. Clin Chem,2002,48(5) :801-802.
  • 6Dewitte K, Fierens C, Stockl D,et al. Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method comparison studies:a critical investigation of its prac- tice[J]. Clin Chem,2002,48(5) :799-801.
  • 7National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standar- ds. Preliminary Evaluation of quantitative clinical la- boratory methods : Approved Guideline [ S]. Wayne: PA,NCCLS EP10-A2,2002.
  • 8Stoockl D,Rodriquez Cabaleiro D, Van Uytfanghe K, et al. Interpreting Method Comparison Studies by Use of the Bland-Altman Plot: Reflecting the Importance of Sample Size by Incorporating Confidence Limits and Predefined Error Limits in the Graphic[J]. Clini- cal Chemistry, 2004,50 (11) : 2216-2218.
  • 9Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in me- thod comparison studies[J]. Stat Methods Med Res, 1999,8(2) :135-160.
  • 10李镒冲,李晓松.两种测量方法定量测量结果的一致性评价[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(17):3263-3266. 被引量:153

共引文献75

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部