期刊文献+

基于改进CREAM扩展法的管制人员人因可靠性分析 被引量:13

Human reliability analysis of the air traffic controllers based on the development method of CREAM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为有效评估管制人员在空中交通指挥过程中的可靠性,减少因管制员人为失误而造成的飞行事故,结合空中交通指挥的独特性确定了管制人员指挥事件序列,改进认知可靠性与失误分析方法(CREAM)扩展法,使其认知行为及其所对应的认知功能更符合管制工作的本质;又类比人员失误概率的共同绩效条件(CPC),并在此基础上新增了9个管制员自身的内在因素(HIF);然后对华东某空管局100位经验丰富的管制员进行问卷调查,确定出每个事件最可能的失效模式;最后确定CPC和HIF所对应水平的认知功能权重,计算得到管制人员指挥过程的人因失效概率。结果表明,由建立的人因可靠性评估流程所得的失效概率与某空管局的管制实际运行相吻合,并针对失误概率较高的部分提出建议。 The given paper is intended to assess the reliability of the air traffic controllers effectively in the flying process and reduce the air-flight accidents likely to be caused by the human errors of the controllers.To achieve the goal of the air flight safety,it is first of all necessary to take into account the particular details of the ATCO control process so as to identify and determine the consequential events in the air traffic control,which may include the following 4 commanding factors,that is,heightening and improvement of the cognitive reliability of the air traffic controllers and their error identification and selection of proper methods.And,secondly,it is of great importance to help them to identify the cognitive behaviors of each event and its corresponding cognitive functions along with enhancing the cognitive reliability and error analysis method(short for CREAM).And,thirdly,the paper also aims to make an analogy to the common performance factors of the human error probabilities,with the newly added 9 human internal factors(HIF) of ATCOs,which can be chosen with the highest regard in the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP).And,last of all,the cognitive function weights corresponding to the CPC and HIF should be trained so that the currently existing failure model equations can be used to work out the revised CFP and eventually assess the failure probabilities of ATCOs in the control process.Therefore,to satisfy the said necessity,the total failure probability can be worked out in the controller's.
作者 刘继新 曾逍宇 冯思旭 李昌城 LIU Ji-xin;ZENG Xiao-yu;FENG Si-xu;LI Chang-cheng(College of Civil Aviation,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106,China)
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第6期2246-2251,共6页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 南京航空航天大学研究生创新基地(实验室)开放基金项目(kfjj20170715) 国家自然科学基金民航联合基金重点项目(U1333202)
关键词 安全管理工程 管制人员 CREAM扩展法 共同绩效因子 人因可靠性 失误概率 safety control air traffic controller CREAM development method common performance condition human reliability failure probability
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1王遥,沈祖培.CREAM——第二代人因可靠性分析方法[J].工业工程与管理,2005,10(3):17-21. 被引量:43
  • 2贺仲雄.模糊数学及其应用[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1998..
  • 3Stanton N. Human Factors in Nuclear Safety [ M]. London (UK):Taylor & Francis Ltd, 1996.
  • 4Hollnagel E. Reliability analysis and operator modeling [ J ].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1996, 52 (3): 327-337.
  • 5Kim I S. Human reliability analysis in the man-machine interface design review [ J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2001, 28(11 ):1069 - 1081.
  • 6Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method [ M].Oxford (UK): Elsevier Science Ltd, 1998.
  • 7Fujita Y, Hollnagel E. Failures without errors: quantification of context in HRA [ J ]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2004, 83(2): 145 -151.
  • 8Hollnagel E. Human Reliability Analysis [ M]. London ( UK ):Context and Control, Academic Press Ltd, 1993.
  • 9张玉东.悲剧发生在空中相撞--飞机空中相撞的原因分析[A].飞行安全与航空工程学术研讨会论文集[C].广东佛山:中国航空学会维修工程专业委员会,2003:106~112
  • 10谢春生,赵煜,韩红蓉.签派工作中的人为因素分析[J].中国民航飞行学院学报,2007,18(5):18-20. 被引量:19

共引文献85

同被引文献122

引证文献13

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部