困境与突破:知识产权审判先例制度效力的发挥

Problems and Solutions: The Application of the Precedent Intellectual Property Cases

先例制度具有解决争点和树立权威的效力。由于先例引用具有制度内的朝新不朝旧、表述生歧义、隐性引用等实体和程序上的问题,以及制度外的裁判规则依据不明及适用法律作出裁判却不引述法律条文的问题,致使先例制度的贯彻不畅,影响其解决争点效力的发挥。通过在裁判说理上尽可能详尽列明适用法律条文及引用先例情况,以此契合先例查找技术手段的关键词搜索模式,可以明确划定先例的裁判规则边界,实现大数据时代下对裁判规则及相关先例的精准查找,并最终助力先例制度效力的发挥。

The precedent case rule has the effect on dispute settlement and authority establishment. Despite the procedural and substantial legal problems, and the problems out of the precedent case rule, the application of the precedent case rule does not work well. Using the keywords searching-pattern fitted reasoning clearly in the written judgment will promote the running of the precedent intellectual property case rule.