期刊文献+

基于Shapley值的纸品供应链绿色收益分配研究——以中顺洁柔纸业为例 被引量:9

Research on Green Income Distribution of Paper Supply Chain Based on Shapley Value—— A Case Study on Zhongshun Jierou Paper Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着我国经济快速增长,资源浪费和环境污染问题也日趋严重,如何做到资源环境约束下的经济可持续发展业成为政府和民众极为关注的重大课题。绿色供应链管理(GSCM)将环境要素融入到供应链管理,是将"绿色环境意识"与"经济发展"并重的一种有效的可持续发展路径。文章以中顺洁柔纸业为案例,测算并分析了考虑绿色贡献度因素的"制浆-造纸-零售"纸品3级供应链收益分配问题,并根据分析对供应链利润进行再分配。以期为考虑绿色贡献的制造业供应链收益分配机制提供一个参考思路。 With the rapid economic growth in China,the problems of resources waste and environmental pollution are becoming increasingly serious.How to achieve sustainable economic development under the constraint of resources and environment has become a major issue of great concern to the government and the public community. Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM)integrates environmental factors into supply chain management,which is an effective sustainable development path that attaches equal importance to "green environmental awareness"and "economic development".Taking Zhongshun Jierou Paper Industry as an example,this paper calculated and analyzed the profit distribution problem of pulping-papermaking-retailing paper supply chain considering the green contribution factor,and redistributed the profit of the supply chain according to the analysis.This paper could be taken as a green contribution to the supply chain profit distribution mechanism of manufacturing industry.
作者 廖吉林 Liao Jilin(College of Economics and Management,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037)
出处 《林业经济》 北大核心 2018年第12期47-50,共4页 Forestry Economics
基金 2015年江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目“绿色供应链合作与收益分配机制研究”(编号:2015SJB045)
关键词 绿色供应链 收益协调 纸品行业 SHAPLEY值法 green supply chain revenue coordination paper industry Shapley Value Method
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1朱庆华,耿勇.中国制造企业绿色供应链管理因素研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(3):81-85. 被引量:42
  • 2Fehr E, Schmidt K M. A theory of fairness,competition, and cooperation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114(3): 817-868.
  • 3Kahneman D, Knetsch J L, Thaler R Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market[J]. The American Economic Review, 1986, 76: 728-741.
  • 4Geyskens I, Steenkamp J B E M, Kumar N. Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1998, 15 (3): 223-248.
  • 5Corsten D, Kumar N. Profits in the pie of the beholder [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2003, 81(5): 22-23.
  • 6Corsten D, Kumar N. Do suppliers benefit from collaborative relationships with large retailers? An empirical investigation of efficient consumer response adoption [J ]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69 ( 3 ) : 80-94.
  • 7Cui T H, Raju J S, Zhang Z J. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53 (8) : 1 303-1 314.
  • 8Pavlov V, Katok E. Fairness and coordination failures in supply chain contracts [R]. University Park, Pennsylvania: Smeal College of Business, The Pennsylvania State University, 2009.
  • 9Katok E, Pavlov V. Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2013, 31(3): 129-137.
  • 10Ho T H, Zhang J. Designing pricing contracts forboundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? [J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(4) : 686-700.

共引文献17

同被引文献81

引证文献9

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部