期刊文献+

先天性巨结肠症术后早期有症状吻合口漏的治疗与转归 被引量:5

Treatment and prognosis of early symptomatic anastomotic leakage after pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung's disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨先天性巨结肠症(Hirschsprung’s disease,HSCR)术后早期有症状吻合口漏的治疗及转归。方法回顾性分析2006年1月至2017年12月收治的15例HSCR术后早期有症状的吻合口漏或其并发症患儿的临床资料。其中,男13例,女2例。结果吻合口漏发生时间为术后(6.8±4.7) d。在当地行肠造瘘8例;在我院行肠造瘘7例,其中5例同时行吻合口再缝合,再缝合与出现症状的中位间隔时间为4 d(1~29 d)。4例患儿(80.0%)行肠造瘘、吻合口再缝合后,吻合口漏治愈;余11例出现了并发症。其中,单纯骶前窦道2例,单纯高位吻合口狭窄5例,骶前窦道同时伴高位吻合口狭窄4例。单纯骶前窦道2例,曾行窦道清除及吻合口再缝合,均失败。此11例患儿均行再次拖出手术-经腹经肛门Soave手术,两次拖出手术的中位间隔时间为1.5年(7个月至7年)。再次拖出手术后,有1例单纯骶前窦道患儿(1/15,6.7%)未愈,仍有肠造瘘。随访14例已关瘘患儿排便情况,随访时间为(61.7±30.9)个月。4例患儿(4/14,28.6%)有不同程度的污粪,均出现在再次拖出手术后。结论早期肠造瘘同时吻合口再缝合可有效治疗HSCR术后吻合口漏。吻合口漏可导致吻合口狭窄、骶前窦道,而经腹经肛门Soave手术可安全有效地治疗这些并发症。 Objective To explore the treatment and prognosis of early symptomatic anastomotic leakage after pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 15 patients with early symptomatic anastomotic leakage or its secondary complications after a pull-through procedure between January 2006 and December 2017 at our hospital. Medical records were reviewed for 13 boys and 2 girls. Results The mean postoperative time of symptom onset of anastomotic leakage was (6.8±4.7) days. Eight patients underwent ostomy creation procedure at local hospitals. In the other 7 patients, ostomy was constructed and anastomotic dehiscences were resutured in 5/7 patients within the same operation. The median time between onset of symptoms and resuturing was 4 (1-29) days. After primary operation, 4 patients (4/5, 80.0%) with ostomy and anastomotic resutruing were cured. There were presacral sinus (n=2), high anastomotic stricture (n=5) and presacral sinus with high anastomotic stricture (n=4). Excision and reanastomosis failed in 2 patients with presacral sinus alone. Eleven patients with stricture or sinus underwent redo pull-through-transanal Soave procedure with laparotomy. The median interval between two pull-through procedures was 1.5 years(7 months to 7 years). After redo pull-through, one patient (1/15, 6.7%) with unhealed presacral sinus underwent another ostomy. Fourteen patients were followed up for a mean period of (61.7±30.9) months. Four patients (4/14, 28.6%) with redo pull-through had varying degrees of soiling. Conclusions Early ostomy and reanastomosis are effective for patients with anastomotic leakage. For anastomotic leakage, the sequelae of anastomotic stricture and presacral sinus may be successfully treated with transanal Soave procedure with laparotomy.
作者 彭春辉 陈亚军 张廷冲 庞文博 王增萌 吴东阳 王凯 Peng Chunhui;Chen Yajun;Zhang Tingchong;Pang Wenbo;Wang Zengmeng;Wu Dongyang;Wang Kai(Department of General Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing 100045, China)
出处 《中华小儿外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第12期895-899,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery
关键词 HIRSCHSPRUNG病 吻合口 狭窄 窦道 Hirschsprung disease Anastomotic stoma Stricture Sinus tract
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献47

  • 1Thornton M, Joshi H, Vimalachandran C, Heath R, Carter P, GurU, Rooney P. Management and outcome of colorectal anastomoticleaks. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 313-320 [PMID: 21107847DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-1094-3].
  • 2Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G. The incidenceof anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 71-79 [PMID: 17181849 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01002.x].
  • 3Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, Mehanna D, Dent OF, ChapuisPH, Bokey EL. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminishedsurvival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.Ann Surg 2004; 240: 255-259 [PMID: 15273549 DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133186.81222.08].
  • 4Marinatou A, Theodoropoulos GE, Karanika S, Karantanos T,Siakavellas S, Spyropoulos BG, Toutouzas K, Zografos G. Doanastomotic leaks impair postoperative health-related quality oflife after rectal cancer surgery- A case-matched study. Dis ColonRectum 2014; 57: 158-166 [PMID: 24401876 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000040].
  • 5Ashburn JH, Stocchi L, Kiran RP, Dietz DW, Remzi FH.Consequences of anastomotic leak after restorative proctectomy forcancer: effect on long-term function and quality of life. Dis ColonRectum 2013; 56: 275-280 [PMID: 23392139 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318277e8a5].
  • 6Brown SR, Mathew R, Keding A, Marshall HC, Brown JM,Jayne DG. The impact of postoperative complications on longtermquality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery. AnnSurg 2014; 259: 916-923 [PMID: 24374539 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000407].
  • 7Kumar A, Daga R, Vijayaragavan P, Prakash A, Singh RK,Behari A, Kapoor VK, Saxena R. Anterior resection for rectalcarcinoma - risk factors for anastomotic leaks and strictures. WorldJ Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 1475-1479 [PMID: 21472107 DOI:10.3748/wjg.v17.i11.1475].
  • 8Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, HaglindE, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakageafter resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: 662-671 [PMID: 24655784DOI: 10.1111/codi.12618].
  • 9Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, ParneixM. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectalcancer. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 355-358 [PMID: 9529492].
  • 10Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors foranastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: resultsof prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 439-444[PMID: 16500248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.10.019].

共引文献14

同被引文献32

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部