期刊文献+

情绪表达冲突问卷中文版应用于乳腺癌患者的信效度分析 被引量:5

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of ambivalence over emotional expression questionnaire: testing in breast cancer survivors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价情绪表达冲突问卷(Ambivalence over emotional expression questionnaire,AEQ)中文版在乳腺癌患者中的信效度。方法将323例乳腺癌患者分为2部分。第一部分样本量为122例,用于项目分析和探索性因素分析;第二部分样本量为201例,用于验证性因素分析、校标效度分析和信度分析。结果问卷为单维结构,单维模型拟合度较好(χ^2/df=1.01,CFI=0.99,TLI=0.99,NFI=0.86,IFI=0.99,RMSEA=0.02)。修订后的情绪表达冲突问卷总分与多伦多述情障碍量表(Toronto alexithymi ascale,TAS)得分呈显著正相关(r=0.28,P<0.01),问卷的Cronbach α系数为0.86,Spearman-Brown分半信度系数为0.80,重测信度系数为0.79。结论修订后的中文版情绪表达冲突问卷具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为测量和评估乳腺癌患者情绪表达冲突的工具。 Objective To examine the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of ambivalence over emotional expression questionnaire(AEQ)in breast cancer survivors.Methods A total of 323 breast cancer survivors were divided into 2 parts: sample 1 contains 122 breast cancer survivors for item and exploratory factor analysis,while sample 2 contains 201 breast cancer survivors for further confirmatory factor analysis,criterion validity,and internal consistency reliability.Results One-factor construct was determined and the results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that one-factor construct AEQ had a good construct validity(χ^2/df=1.01,CFI=0.99,TLI=0.99,NFI=0.86,IFI=0.99,RMSEA=0.02).The AEQ score was correlated with TAS-20(r=0.28,P<0.01).Cronbach α coefficient,Spearman-Brown split coefficient and the test-retest reliability of AEQ were 0.86,0.80 and 0.79,respectively.Conclusion The AEQ is a reliable tool to assess the ambivalence over emotional expression in Chinese breast cancer survivors.
作者 季丽丽 王丽娟 吕倩 卢国华 Ji Lili;Wang Lijuan;Lyu Qian;Lu Guohua(Department of Medical Nursing,Weifang Medical University,Weifang 261042,China;Department of Psychology,Weifang Medical University,Weifang 261042,China;Department of Health Disparities Research,the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston 75835,America)
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第12期1138-1142,共5页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2016GM05) 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2017WS852) 潍坊市科技发展计划项目(2015WS009).
关键词 情绪表达冲突问卷 信度 效度 乳腺癌患者 Ambivalence over emotional expression questionnaire Reliability Validity Breast cancer survivors
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献77

  • 1全国肿瘤防治研究办公室.中国恶性肿瘤死亡调查研究(1990-1992)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.82-101.
  • 2FREUD S. Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis [ M ]. London : Hogarth, 1915 - 1917.
  • 3ROGERS C R. Client- centered therapy [ M ]. Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin, 1951.
  • 4ANTONI M H. Empirical studies of emotional disclosure in the face of stress : A progress report [ J ]. Advances in Mind Body Medicine, 1999,15:163 -166.
  • 5HARKER L, KELTNER D. Expressions of positive emotion in women's college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001, 80 : 112 - 124.
  • 6BERRY D S, PENNEBAKER J W. Nonverbal and verbal emotional expression and health [ J ]. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 1993,59:11 - 19.
  • 7TRAUE H C, PENNEBAKER J W. Inhibition and arousal [ M] ffH C TRAUE, J W PENNEBAKER,Eds. Emotion inhibition and health. Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe and Huber, 1993 : 10 - 31.
  • 8GAYTON W F, BASSETF J E, TAVORMINA J, OZMON K L. Repression- sensitization and health behavior[ J]. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46: 1542 - 1544.
  • 9FRIEDMAN H S, HARRIS M J, HALL J A. Nonverbal expression of emotion: Healthy charisma or coronary - prone behavior[M]//C VANDYKE, L TEMOSHOK, L S ZEGANS (Eds.). Emotions in health and illness. New York : Grnne and Stratton, 1984 : 15l - 165.
  • 10FRIEDMAN H S, BOOTH - KEWLEY S. The ' disease - prone personality' : A metaanalytic view of the con- struct [ J]. American Psychologist, 1987,42, 539 - 555.

共引文献1102

同被引文献73

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部