在秋菊的“说法”与国家法之间——一种正式法律制度的解释

Between Qiu Ju's Claim and State Laws:A Formal Legal Interpretation

正式法律制度能够提供秋菊讨要的"说法"。秋菊所谓的"说法",体现了她对自身权利的理解和维护,这种权利观与现代意义上的权利观只是程度上的不同,并不存在本质上的差异。这种"说法"与国家正式法律制度之间的矛盾与冲突并不存在,主要是因为人的因素,而不是因为制度,由于没有适时地把生活用语转换成法律术语,法律机器识别不了,才没有产生出想要的结果。村长身上所体现的只要"因公"就可以为所欲为的权力观,是实现法治中国的极大障碍。

The formal legal system can provide the"argument"of Qiu Ju's discussion which represents her interpretation and protection of her right.This kind of notion of right is different from the modern one due to the extent differences,and there is no difference in nature.This"argument"has no conflicts with formal law.Not the cause of the system,but the cause of manmade,which did not timely translate the words of life into legal terms and produce the results of Qiu Ju's wants.The village chief can do whatever they want,only"for the public",which is the great obstacle to achieve the rule of law in China.