摘要
随着风险社会概念的盛行,风险刑法理论也越来越得到国内学者的支持。分析我国社会性质,在社会形态、风险来源及研究范式与西方社会存在显著区别,不宜对西方社会学中的风险社会理论持拿来主义态度。在社会属性、风险性质和刑法理论等层面上,并没有为风险刑法提供充足的社会基础与理论支持,分析我国近年来的刑法修正案,风险刑法理论在刑事立法层面上的影响也较为有限。在风险高发的压缩性社会形态下,刑法解释应采取相对克制的姿态,认真遵循刑事立法的精神,充分体现沟通协商的态度。
With the prevalence of the concept of risk society,the theory of risk criminal law is increasingly supported by domestic scholars.By analyzing the social nature,it is easy to find out that there are obvious differences in social form,risk sources and research paradigm with the Western society.So it is not appropriate to adopt the doctrine of risks sociology from the western.In terms of social attributes,risk nature and criminal law theory,it does not provide sufficient social basis and theoretical support for risk criminal law.By analyzing the recent amendments of the criminal law in China,the influence of risk criminal law theory on criminal legislation is relatively limited.In the high-risk compressed society,criminal law interpretation should adopt a relatively restrained attitude,conscientiously follow the spirit of criminal legislation,and fully reflect the attitude of communication and consultation.
作者
赵运锋
ZHAO Yun-feng(Criminal Justice College of Shanghai Institute of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)
出处
《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期77-84,共8页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金项目"风险社会与刑事处罚早期化问题研究"(17BFX191)阶段性成果
关键词
风险社会
风险刑法
刑法修正案
刑法解释
risk society
risk criminal law
amendment of criminal law
criminal law interpretation