期刊文献+

教育研究法的主流-论混合法研究

Main Stream of Educational Research-A Study on Bleaching Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在教育研究领域,量化研究与质性研究间方法和范式的斗争曾经一直是焦点问题,随着混合法研究的不断成熟与完善,融合定量与定性的新教育研究范式成为主流趋势。伴随着当今信息社会云计算和大数据热潮,借此开展对教学研究新的尝试本无可厚非,然而部分研究者在研究过程中无视混合法研究的先进性,过分依赖网络数据的量化研究,而忽视教育研究系统问题中的质性部分。鉴于此,加强混合法研究在当下教育研究核心地位的理解十分必要,与此同时希望大力倡导多元并存、混合共融的研究氛围。 In the realm of educational research,the approaches and modes in the struggle between the quantity research and quality study have been a focusing problem.With the constant maturity and improvement of bleaching method,new teaching norm merging quantity and quality has became main stream.Accompanying with current society’s cloud computation and big data’s boom,new attempt towards educational research seems no much criticism,yet partial researchers ignored advantages of bleaching method in the process of exploration but depended excessively on internet’s quantity research and neglected quality section in the educational system.Hence,it is necessary to strengthen the bleaching method research in the current education’s position,simultaneously,we advocate to establish an atmosphere of coexistence among merger and combination.
作者 丛培良 罗伟华 周振君 许培俊 齐琳 CONG Pei-liang;LUO Wei-hua;ZHOU Zhen-jun;XU Pei-jun;QI Lin(Changan University,710054,Xi'an,Shaanxi,China)
机构地区 长安大学
出处 《陕西青年职业学院学报》 2018年第4期10-12,16,共4页 Journal of Shaanxi Youth Vocational College
基金 2017中央高校教育教学改革专项 0012-310631171436
关键词 量化研究 质性研究 混合法研究 Quantity Research Quality Research Bleaching Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1VIADERO D. 'Mixed Methods' research examined researchers see pros and cons of 'Mixed Methods' studies[N]. Education Week, 2005-01-26(20).
  • 2JOHNSON. R B, ONWUEGBUZIE A J. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come[J]. Educational Researcher, 2004, (33) : 12-26.
  • 3HOWE K R, Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis, or, dogmas die hard[j], Education Researcher, 1992, (17) : 10-16.
  • 4TASHAKKORI A, TEDDIAE C. Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches[A]. Applied Social Research Methods Series[C]. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage. 1998,(46).
  • 5ONWUEGBUZIE A J, TEDDLIE, C. A Framework for Analyzing Data in Mixed methods In Social and Behavioral Research[M]. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage,2003. 351-383.
  • 6GREENE J C, CARACELLI V J, GRAHAM W F.Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation design[J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989, (11) :255-274.
  • 7SECHREST L, SIDANA S, Quantitative and qualitative research methods: is there an alternative? [J].Evaluation Program Planning, 1995, (18) : 77-87.
  • 8TIERNEY W G,JUN A, A university helps prepare low income youths for eollege[J]. The Journal of Higher Education, 2001, (72): 205-225.
  • 9(瑞士)皮亚杰(Piaget,J.)著,卢燺选.皮亚杰教育论著选[M]人民教育出版社,1990.
  • 10邓猛,潘剑芳.论教育研究中的混合方法设计[J].教育研究与实验,2002(3):56-61. 被引量:25

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部