期刊文献+

ICU气管切开患者撤机后应用呼吸湿化治疗仪的临床疗效观察 被引量:19

Clinical efficacy of using respiratory humidification apparatus(AIRVO_2) in patients with tracheotomy after successful weaning from mechanical ventilation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察重症加强治疗病房气管切开患者撤机后应用呼吸湿化治疗仪的临床疗效。方法将气管切开患者分成观察组(AIRVO_2呼吸湿化治疗仪组)和对照组(呼吸机湿化装置联合气切面罩加温湿化给氧组),各50例。在常规治疗基础上,观察两组撤机后0、6、12、24、48、72 h血气指标(pH、PaO_2、PaCO_2、PaO_2/FiO_2)、临床症状指标(心率、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度)、呼吸浅快指数(RSBI)、痰液黏稠度、肺部感染率、脱机成功率及日均撤机费用等指标并进行比较。结果在常规治疗基础上,两组经不同方案治疗后各项指标均取得明显改善。相同时间点痰液黏稠度气道湿化效果观察组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后各时点两组的心率、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度等指标较治疗前均有明显改善,且治疗后两组间相比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者上述血气指标经治疗后均取得明显改善,不同时间点PaO_2、PaCO_2改善情况两组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗72 h后,观察组RSBI、肺部感染率均低于对照组,脱机成功率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者平均每住院日撤机单项费用低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组再次出现低氧血症1例,对照组出现低氧血症9例,需重新进行机械通气。结论重症加强治疗病房气管切开患者撤机后应用呼吸湿化治疗仪能取得较好的治疗效果,具有良好的临床推广应用价值。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of AIRVO2 respiratory humidification apparatus in patients with tracheotomy after successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit(ICU).Methods One hundred subjects were randomly divided into a control group(treated with the tracheotomy mask joint oxygen inhalation by heating humidifier,n=50) and an observation group(treated with AIRVO2 model,n=50) on the basis of conventional therapy.Blood gas indexes(pH,PaO2,PaCO2,PaO2/FiO2) and clinical data(heart rate,respiratory rate,SpO2,sputum viscosity) were recorded at 0 h,6 h,12 h,24 h,48 h,72 h after weaning.Besides,the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection,rapid shallow breathing index(RSBI),successful weaning rate from mechanical ventilation and daily cost of weaning between the two groups were compared at 72 h after weaning.Results After treatment,all observed data of the patients were obviously improved compared with those before treatment.The differences of humidification effects between the observation group and the control group at the same time point were statistically significant(P<0.05).The differences of heart rate,respiratory rate,and SpO2 between the observation group and the control group at the same time point were statistically significant(P<0.05).The improvement of PaO2 and PaCO2 at the same time point were statistically different between the observation group and the control group(P<0.05).Seventy-two hours after weaning,the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection and RSBI in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05),successful weaning rate from mechanical ventilation in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05),and the average daily cost of weaning from mechanical ventilation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Nine patients in the control group and 1 patient in the observation group needed secondary mechanical ventilation due to hypoxemia.Conclusion The therapy of AIRVO2 respiratory humidification apparatus combined with conventional treatment may achieve satisfactory effect for patients of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation with tracheotomy,and it is worthy of promotion in clinical use.
作者 李冰 杨元立 贾晔然 曹枫 陈荣琳 张红璇 LI Bing;YANG Yuanli;JIA Yeran;CAO Feng;CHEN Ronglin;ZHANG Hongxuan(Department of Critical Care Medicine,Longgang Central Hospital of Shenzhen City,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518116,P.R.China;Eastern Section,Guangdong General Hospital,Guangdong Institute of Geriatrics,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510180,P.R.China)
出处 《中国呼吸与危重监护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第1期37-41,共5页 Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
关键词 气管切开 撤机 呼吸湿化治疗仪 临床疗效 Tracheotomy Weaning from mechanical ventilation Respiratory humidification treatment apparatus Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献120

共引文献278

同被引文献188

引证文献19

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部