期刊文献+

奖励合同下我国公立医院降低不合理医疗费用的路径选择

Research on the Path Choice of the Reducing Unreasonable Medical Expenses in Public Hospitals of China under the Incentive Payment Contract
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨降低我国公立医院不合理医疗费用的有效途径。方法:在政府或主管部门为医生提供降低医疗费用奖励合同的条件下,通过建立数理模型分析了医生是风险中性和风险规避时在降低医疗费用方面的努力水平、行为决策及其影响因素。结果:诊治疾病所需的基本医疗费用对医生的最优努力水平影响是负向的,医生努力水平的有效性、其他医生的努力水平、不同医生间的竞争强度对医生最优努力水平的影响是正向的。而边际奖励、医生的风险规避程度和政府给予医生奖励的医疗费用临界水平对医生最优努力行为的影响,都将依据约束条件的不同而不同。结论:政府或主管部门应根据上述分析结果提供相应路径选择。 Objective: To discuss the effective ways to reduce the unreasonable medical expenses of the public hospitals in China.Methods: It built the mathematical models to analyze the decision of the effort level and its influential factors about the reduction of the medical costs for the risk-neutral doctors and the risk-averse doctors under the condition that the government or the authorities provided doctors with an incentive payment contracts for the effort to reduce the medical costs and doctors in the public hospitals in China. Results: The basic medical expenses for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases had negatively effect on the optimal effort level of doctors. The effective degree of effort, the effort level of the other doctors and the intensity of competition between different doctors all had positive effect on the optimal effort level of doctors. However, the marginal incentive payment, the degrees of risk-aversion and the critical level of medical costs of the payment obtained from the government had different effects on the effort level according to the different constraint conditions. Conclusion: The government or the authorities should provide the path choice according to these results.
作者 王俏荔 WANG Qiao-li(School of Public Health and Management,Ningxia Medical University,Yinchuan,750004,China)
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2019年第1期9-12,共4页 Chinese Health Economics
基金 2017年宁夏回族自治区哲学社会科学规划年度项目(17NXBGL02)
关键词 公立医院 医疗费用 奖励合同 public hospital medical expenses incentive payment contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1朱恒鹏.医疗体制弊端与药品定价扭曲[J].中国社会科学,2007(4):89-103. 被引量:179
  • 2中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组,吕政,金碚.对南京医药“药房托管”新模式的分析[J].中国工业经济,2007(8):114-121. 被引量:18
  • 3Coscelli,A.2000.“The Importance of Doctors’and Patients’Preferences in the Prescription Decision.”Journal of IndustrialEconomics,48(3):349-369.
  • 4Dulleck,U.,and R.Kerschbamer.2006.“On Doctors,Mechanics,and Computer Specialists:The Economics of Credence Goods.”Journal of Economic Literature,44(1):5-42.
  • 5Emons,W.2001.“Credence Goods Monopolists.”International Journal of Industrial Organization,19(3-4):375-389.
  • 6Hellerstein,J.1998.“The Importance of the Physician in the Generic versus Trade Name Decision.”Rand Journal of Economics,29(1):108-136.
  • 7Iizuka,T.2007.“Experts’Agency Problems:Evidence from the Prescription Drug Market in Japan.”Rand Journal of Economics,38(3):844-862.
  • 8Lundin,D.2000.“Moral Hazard in Physician Prescription Behavior.”Journal of Health Economics,19(5):632-662.
  • 9Stern,S.,and Trajtenberg,M.1998.“Empirical Implications of Physician Authority in Pharmaceutical Decision Making.”NBERWorking Paper 6851.
  • 10于梅,于润吉.警惕“以药养医”演变为“以械养医”[J].中国医院院长,2008,4(3):57-58. 被引量:5

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部