摘要
行政程序和司法程序中的权利要求保护范围不一致,非基于行政程序和司法程序不同的目标与价值,而是缘于行政程序和司法程序中不同主体在不同的时间基点,采用不同的思维针对权利要求进行解释。行政程序和司法程序中权利要求保护范围不一致会损害专利法适用的整体性、统一性和稳定性,行政程序和司法程序应彼此谦抑,融合彼此关于权利要求解释的合理因素,共同服务于专利制度促进技术进步、经济发展的制度目标。
The scope of claims in administrative procedure and judicial procedure is inconsistent,which is not based on different goals and values of administrative procedure and judicial procedure,but due to that different people adopting different ways of thinking interpret claims during administrative procedure and judicial procedure at different time. The inconsistence will undermine the integrity,unity and stability of the application of the patent law. Administrative procedure and judicial procedure should be modest to each other,incorporate reasonable elements of each other’s interpretation of claims,and serve to the goal of patent system together,which aims to promote technological progress and economic development.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期134-140,共7页
Law Science Magazine
基金
国家社科基金项目"反不正当竞争法立法问题研究"(项目编号:17BFX010)
上海交通大学文理交叉课题"知识产权保护与创新政策研究"(项目编号:AF1900034)的阶段性成果
关键词
行政程序
司法程序
权利要求保护范围
二元体制
administrative procedure
judicial procedure
scope of claims
binary separation system