摘要
20世纪八九十年代整理旧志、编纂书目与撰写提要时,对于嘉靖间归德志的纂修与版本情况,由于当时藏本分散,编撰者未能尽见,便依据明清以来书目中的信息做出推断,或将著录各异的嘉靖间所纂归德志视为一种志书,或将后纂者视作前修者的增补本。实际上,明嘉靖间纂修了两部归德志:一部纂于嘉靖二十年代的归德州时期,纂者为黄钧;另一部纂于嘉靖四十年代的归德府时期,纂者为李嵩。前后所纂不仅存在州志与府志的性质差别,而且其目录结构和载录范围等也各有不同。
In the 1980 s and 1990 s, plenty of old local chronicles around the country were sort out and their catalogues and summaries were completed. Because different editions of GUIDEZHI were dispersed, the editors of catalogues deduced conclusions from the bibliographies of the Ming and Qing Dynasties that its different editions actually came from the same one or the latter edition as a revision of the former one. In fact, there were two different editions of GUIDEZHI in the Jiajing Era, while one compiled by Huang Jun in the 20th year of Jiajing Era when Guide was a district, and another by Li Song in the 40th year of the Jiajing Era when Guide was a prefecture. Their structures and recording ranges are different.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期107-115,共9页
Journal of Historiography
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“明清以来黄河中下游农耕社会转型的历史经验研究”(项目编号:16JJD770020)阶段性成果.