期刊文献+

新三板企业退出做市转让:“情非得已”还是“心甘情愿”? 被引量:9

NEEQ Listed Firms Exit Market Making: “Reluctance” or “Willingness”?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以新三板退出做市转让的挂牌企业为研究对象,本文分析交易方式转变的动因和效果。分析发现,企业退出做市转让的原因主要为摘牌、筹划IPO、实现大宗交易、提升股票估值及流动性。为进一步研究做市转协议的市场效应,选取2016~2017年新三板挂牌公司数据,采用双重差分倾向得分匹配模型(PSM-DID)检验了做市转协议对股票流动性的影响。研究发现,企业由做市转为协议后,换手率、交易规模和股票估值均显著提升,印证了部分做市企业基于流动性和估值考虑,转为协议转让的内在动因。 Using the samples of the NEEQ listed firms exiting market making, this paper analyzes the motivations and effects of exiting market making. The motivations include delisting, preparing for IPO, completing block trades, and enhancing the firm value and liquidity. The further study focuses on the market effect of transformation from market making to agreement. Using the sample of the listed firms for the period of 2016~2017 with PSM-DID method, we revealed the enhancing effect of transformation from market making to agreement on liquidity. The empirical results showed that the firms’ turnover ratio, deal size and valuation are significantly improved after transformation from market making to agreement. It also proves the motivation of some firms exiting market making out of considerations of liquidity and valuation.
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期11-19,共9页 Securities Market Herald
基金 教育部青年基金项目"交易方式选择的微观动因及效应分析--基于新三板挂牌企业的经验证据"(17YJC630057) 对外经济贸易大学国内外联合培养项目
关键词 新三板 做市转让 协议转让 企业估值 NEEQ market making transfer transfer by agreement valuation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1辛清泉,林斌,王彦超.政府控制、经理薪酬与资本投资[J].经济研究,2007,42(8):110-122. 被引量:948
  • 2唐雪松,周晓苏,马如静.上市公司过度投资行为及其制约机制的实证研究[J].会计研究,2007(7):44-52. 被引量:350
  • 3张瀛.做市商、流动性与买卖价差:基于银行间债券市场的流动性分析[J].世界经济,2007,30(10):86-95. 被引量:31
  • 4Admati, A., and P. Pfleiderer. 2009. Tile 'Wall Street Walk' and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice. Re- view of Financial Studies, 22 (7) : 2645 -2685.
  • 5Brunnermeier, M. K., and L. H. Pedersen. 2009. Mar- ket Liquidity and Funding Liquidity. Review of Financial Stud- ies, 22 (6):2201-2238.
  • 6Edmans, A. 2009. Blockholder Trading, Market Efficien- cy, and Managerial Myopia. Journal of Finance, 64 (6): 2481 - 2513.
  • 7Holmstrom, B., and J. Tirole. 1993. Market liquidity and Performance Monitoring. Journal of Political Economy, 101 (4) : 678 -709.
  • 8Jayaraman, S., and T. T. Milbourn. 2012. The Role of Stock Liquidity in Executive Compensation. Accounting Review, 87 (2): 537-563.
  • 9Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76 (2): 323-329.
  • 10Khanna, N. , and R. Sonti. 2004. Value Creating Stock Manipulation: Feedback Effect of Stock Prices on Firm Value. Journal of Financial Markets, 7 (3) : 237 -270.

共引文献231

同被引文献128

引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部