期刊文献+

CT重建评价颈椎螺纹融合器植骨融合的可行性研究 被引量:1

The Evaluation of the Bone Fusion in the Cervical Interbody Threaded Cage by CT Reconstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索利用CT重建评价颈椎螺纹融合器植骨融合的可行性。方法:随访因颈椎病行颈椎螺纹融合器+钛板植入术后患者51例,随访时间6~15个月,其中男32例,女19例,平均年龄(45.4±2.4)岁,于术后7天摄颈椎正侧位X线片,随访时摄颈椎过曲过伸位和正侧位X线片,并行颈椎CT重建,分别采用X线法和CT重建法评价植骨融合情况,CT法分优、良、差三级。结果:X线法观察植骨融合率为100%,CT重建法观察植骨融合率为94.1%,两种方法经统计学分析无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:在对植骨融合进行评估时,和X线相比,CT重建法更加准确和直观,能对植骨融合生长情况进行了解,值得临床推广。 Objective: To evaluate the bone graft fusion in the cervical threaded cage and search for a better assessment method. Methods: To follow up 51 patients having undergone the cervical threaded cage plus internal fixed plate system for 6 to 15 months, average age of 45 years, 32 male, 19 female. To take the anterior and posterior, lateral plain radiographs within 1 week post operation, and to take the both positions plain radiographs above plus flexion and extension dynamic plain radiographs when followed up, also with the CT reconstructions of the cervical vertebra, by which the condition of bone fusion could be classified as excellent, good and poor three grades, then we will analyze the result by both methods. Results: The rate of the bone graft fusion was 100% by plain radiograph and 94.1% by CT reconstruction. No statistical significant difference was found between the two methods. Conclusion: The CT reconstruction method seems more visualized, accurate, and objective than plain radiograph in evaluating the bone fusion of the cervical cage and could observe the specialized way of the bone graft growth, find the poor growth with no internal fixed system displacement yet hardly be found by plain radiograph.
作者 付索超 雷伟 FU Suo-chao;LEI Wei(Department of Spine Two,Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital of Southern War Zone, Guangzhou 510000,Guangdong Province,P.R.C)
出处 《中国数字医学》 2019年第1期41-43,60,共4页 China Digital Medicine
基金 自体骨及自体骨复合PRP在骨质疏松兔腰椎椎体间融合规律的研究(编号:广东省卫生和计划生育委员会A2016016)~~
关键词 CT重建 颈椎融合器 植骨融合 CT reconstruction cervical interbody cage bone fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献42

  • 1Malloy KM,Hilirand AS.Autograft versus allograft in degenerative cervical disease[J].Clin Orthop,2002,394:27-38.
  • 2Wilke Hi,Kettler A,Goetz C,et al.Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements:an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage[J].Spine,2000,25(21):2762-2770.
  • 3Hacker R J.Threaded cages for degenerative cervical disease[J].Clin Orthop,2002,394:473 -480.
  • 4Samandouras G,Shafafy M,Hamlyn PJ.A new anterior cervical instrumentation system combining an intradiscal cage with an integrated plate:an early technical report[J].Spine,2001,26 (10):1188-1192.
  • 5Brantigan JW,et al[J].Spine,2000,25(11):1437-1446.
  • 6Kandziora F,Pflugmacher R,Scholz M,et al.Bioabsorbable interboby cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model[J].Spine,2004,29:1845-1855.
  • 7Kandziora F,schollmeier G,schdz M.Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model[J].J Neurosurg,2002,96:321-332.
  • 8Vavruch L,Hedlund R,Javid D,et al.A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine:a clinical and radiologic study[J].Spine,2002,27(16):1694-1701.
  • 9Sidha KS,prochnon TD,Schmitt P,et al[J].Spine J,2001,1(5):331-340.
  • 10Carman TH,Hopkins D.Neurosarg Focus[J].,2004,16 (3):6.

共引文献5

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部