2Phillips LH,Blanco IS,Sussmm MD.Direct spinal stimulation for intraoperative monitoring during scohasis surgery [J]. Muscle Nerve, 1995,18(3 ) : 319-325.
3Bednarik J,Kadanka Z,Vohanka S,et al The value of somatosensory-and motor-evoked potentials in predicting and monitoring the effect of therapy in spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Prospective randomized study [J]. Spine,1999,24( 15): 1593-1598.
4Lyu RK,Tang LM,Chen CJ,The use of evoked potentials for clinical correlation and surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with intramedullary high signal intensity on MRI [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry[J]. 2004,75(2) : 256-261.
5Bouchard JA,Bohlman HH,Biro C. Intraoperative improvements of somatosensory evoked potentials: correlation to clinical outcome in surgery for cervical spondylitic myelopathy[J]. Spine,1996,21(5):589-594.
6Mauguiere F Clinical utility of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs):present debates and future trends[J]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl,1996,46:27-33.
7May DM,Jones S J, Croekard HA. Soanatmensory evoked potentialmonitor spinal cord surgery :idenfcation of pre -and intrmperative risk factors associated with neurological deteriorstion[J]. Neurosurg, 1996,85(4) :566-573.
8Hilibrand AS,Schwartz DM,Sethuraman V,Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery [J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2004,86(6) : 1248-1253.
9Matityahu A, ElsonJ, Morshed S, et at. Survivorship and severe com-plications are worse for octogenarians and elderly patients with pelvis fractures as compared to adults: data from the national trauma data bankj L].J Osteoporos, 2012, 2012: 475739.
10Koenig K, HuddlestonJ I 3rd, Huddleston H, et at. '" Advanced age and comorbidity increase the risk for adverse events after revision total hip arthroplasty[J].J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27 (7) : 1402 - 1407.
