"雨课堂"混合式教学在全科医师培训中的应用

Exploration of blended teaching based on "Rain Class" in general practitioner training

目的探索基于"雨课堂"的混合式教学在全科医师培训中的应用效果。方法采用随机抽样方法,在南京市迈皋桥、宁海、小市、铁心桥、赛虹桥、西岗、华侨路、南湖八家社区卫生服务中心,选取132名社区全科医师为研究对象。其中66名采用"雨课堂"混合式教学,纳入观察组;66名采用传统多媒体教学,纳入对照组;两组均进行"房颤"相关知识的教学。课程结束后采用统一试题评价教学效果,并应用问卷调查学生对"雨课堂"教学形式的评价。采用SPSS19.0进行t检验及卡方检验。结果观察组考试均分(82.95±12.86)明显高于对照组(60.45±18.91)(P=0.000)。按学历进一步进行分层分析,低学历组中观察组考试均分(88.06±9.12)明显高于对照组(49.66±13.88)(P=0.000)。而在高学历组中,观察组分数与对照组差异无统计学意义(P=0.054)。观察组55.3%的学生对"雨课堂"教学非常满意,34.8%满意,9.9%认为不满意。结论将基于"雨课堂"的混合式教学应用于全科医师培训,有利于增加学员与培训教师的交流互动,提高学员学习效率及临床能力。

Objective To explore the effect of blended teaching model based on "Rain Class" in general practitioner training. Methods Random sampling method was adopted in which totally 132 general practitioners were divided into two groups, 66 in experimental group, 66 in the control group. Blended teaching method and traditional teaching method was implemented in the experimental group and the control group, respectively. At the end of the course, unified examination questions were used to evaluate the teaching effect, and questionnaires were used to investigate the students' evaluation of the "rain classroom" teaching method. Results The final exam score of experimental group was significantly higher than that of control group [(82.95±12.86) vs. (60.45±18.91), P=0.000]. Further stratification analysis was conducted according to educational background, and the average score of low education group in the observation group was significantly higher than that of high education group [(88.06±9.12) vs. (49.66±13.88), P=0.000]. 55.3% of the general practitioners in experimental group were very satisfied with "Rain Class" teaching, 34.8% satisfied, and only 9.9% of the general practitioners were dissatisfied. Conclusion Blended teaching model could help to promote the exchange and interaction between students and teachers and improve learning efficiency and clinical ability.