期刊文献+

基于邻域互信息的区间DEA交叉效率评价方法 被引量:4

A Cross-efficiency Evaluation Method of Interval DEA Based on Neighborhood Mutual Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的交叉效率评价方法多数是采用一个模型进行求解,并且往往会出现多个决策单元(DMU)均有效,因此不能对所有的决策单元进行充分排序。文章基于区间DEA,同时用进取型、仁慈型和竞合交叉效率模型进行求解,并对竞合模型中的分组方法进行改进,提出利用区间值邻域互信息进行分组,之后利用潜在信息函数对三个模型的效率分数进行集结,得到每个决策单元最终的效率分数及排名结果。最后通过一个算例验证了所提方法的合理性和可行性。 Most of the traditional cross-efficiency evaluation methods use one model to solve problems, and tend to show up multiple efficient decision-making units(DMU), thus it is unable to sufficiently order all decision units. Based on interval DEA,this paper uses aggressive approach, benevolent approach and competing cross efficiency models to solve problems, improves the grouping method in the competition model, and proposes using interval valued neighborhood mutual information to group. Then the paper utilizes the potential information function to assemble the efficiency scores of the three models to obtain the final efficiency score and ranking result of each DMU. Finally, an example is given to verify the rationality and feasibility of the proposed method.
作者 范建平 赵苗 吴美琴 Fan Jianping;Zhao Miao;Wu Meiqin(School of Economics andManagement,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006,China)
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期77-81,共5页 Statistics & Decision
基金 山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究项目(2017302)
关键词 区间DEA 交叉效率 邻域互信息 潜在信息函数 interval DEA cross efficiency neighborhood mutual information potential information function
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1谭俊峰,张朋柱,程少川,孔彬.群体研讨中的共识分析和评价技术[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(1):55-61. 被引量:11
  • 2梁樑,吴杰.区间DEA的一种改进的充分排序方法[J].系统工程,2006,24(1):107-110. 被引量:25
  • 3武玉英,何喜军.基于DEA方法的北京可持续发展能力评价[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(3):117-123. 被引量:127
  • 4Seiford L M, Thrall R M. Recent development in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, 46: 7-38.
  • 5Adler N, Friedman L, Zilla S. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140:249 265.
  • 6Sexton T R. Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions[M]//Silkman R H. Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986: 73-105.
  • 7Doyle J, Green R. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and the uses[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45: 567-578.
  • 8Wu J, Liang L, Zha Y, et al. Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross- evaluation[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 4826-4829.
  • 9Wu J, Liang L, Yang F. Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 872-876.
  • 10Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078 1092.

共引文献69

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部