文化经济模型中的时间问题

Time Issues in Cultural Economic Models

斯图亚特·坎宁安等人总结的四种文化经济模型影响广泛。模型来源于两个理论假设,雷蒙德·威廉斯的三种文化类型与文化在经济中的嵌入,两者都与时间有关:前者是在阶级斗争的推动下文化更迭在时间中的展开,后者是在技术驱动下经济一文化结构的演化。但阶级斗争作为外部因素的驱动逻辑最终又会回到经济决定论,技术驱动在此处又落入了网络(模型)本体论化的陷阱,都无法成为文化经济模型中时间问题背后的有效支撑。在承认社会演化的前提下,本文尝试以社会合作行为机制、社会功能分化与文化经济总体来对文化经济模式背后的时间问题做更有效的支撑。

The four cultural economic models summarized by Stuart Cunningham et al. have a wide range of impacts. The model is derived from two theoretical assumptions: Raymond Williams’ s three cultural types and cultural embedding in the economy, both of which are related to time.The former is the development of cultural change under the impetus of class struggle. The latter is the evolution of economic-cultural structure driven by technology. However, the driving logic of class struggle as an external factor will eventually return to economic determinism, where the technology drives has once again fallen into the trap of network(model) on tology also can not be an effective support behind the time problem in the cultural economic model. Under the premise of acknowledging the evolution of society, this paper attempts to use the mechanisms of corporateaction,social function differentiation, and cultural economic ensemble to serve as a more effective support for the time behind the cultural economic model.