期刊文献+

超低剂量心脏CT扫描对冠状动脉狭窄分级和量化的价值 被引量:4

Value of Ultra-low Dose Coronary CT Angiography for Classification and Quantification of Coronary Stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:在冠状动脉CT成像(CCTA)中,以100 kV扫描为参照,评估70 kV扫描对冠状动脉狭窄程度分级和量化的一致性。方法:选取70名临床怀疑或已知冠心病且适合行CCTA检查的患者,使用256排宽探测器CT,分别用70 kV和100kV管电压进行单心动周期CCTA检查。比较两组扫描的有效辐射剂量(ED)及图像信噪比(SNR)。对冠状动脉的9个节段进行狭窄程度分析。将狭窄程度分为正常(0%)、轻度(1%~49%)、中度(50%~69%)和重度(70%~100%)四个等级。记录狭窄程度一致的冠状动脉节段数目。使用Bland-Altman分析比较冠脉狭窄程度的一致性。结果:70 kV扫描的有效辐射剂量显著低于100 kV扫描的,分别为(0.26±0.08)mSv和(1.07±0.05)mSv(P <0.01),信噪比显著低于100 kV扫描,分别为16.53±5.87和18.19±6.07(P <0.05)。在630个冠状动脉节段中,608个(96.5%)分级一致。Bland-Altman分析显示两组扫描方法评估狭窄程度差异性的95%可信区间约在15%~30%之间。结论:70kV冠状动脉CTA成像可以大幅度降低辐射剂量,对冠脉狭窄程度的分级与常规100kV扫描基本一致。但是对冠状动脉的精确量化测量与常规扫描有一定的差异性。 Objective: To investigate the agreement between 70 k V and 100 k V scan for classification and quantification of coronary artery stenosis, on wide-detector coronary computed tomography angiography(CCTA)examination. Methods: 70 patients of suspected or known coronary artery disease were included, who were suitable for CCTA. Single heartbeat CCTA was performed on 256-row wide-detector CT by using 70 k V and100 k V tube voltage, respectively. Effective radiation dose and signal-to-noise ratio(SNR) were compared between these two groups. Nine coronary segments were evaluated, in which the stenosis degree was categorized as: normal(0%), mild(1% ~ 49%), moderate(50% ~69%) and severe(70% ~ 100%). We recorded the number of consistent stenosis category between 70 k V and 100 k V scan. Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate coronary stenosis between 70 k V and 100 k V scan. Result: Effective radiation dose of 70 k V scan was significantly lower than that of 100 k V, which were(0.26 ± 0.08)mSv and(1.07 ± 0.05)mSv(P < 0.01),respectively. SNR of 70 k V scan was significantly lower either, which were 16.53 ± 5.87 and 18.19 ± 6.07(P < 0.05), respectively. Stenosis degree of 630 coronary segments were evaluated, in which 608(96.5%) were consistent between 70 k V and 100 k V scan. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a 95% confidence interval(CI)between 15% and 30% for coronary stenosis between the two groups. Conclusion: CCTA of 70 k V tube voltage significantly reduces radiation dose, while showing optimal consistent categorization for coronary stenosis to100 k V scan. However, variability exists between 70 k V and 100 k V scans for precise quantification of coronary stenosis.
作者 陈安 解学乾 王政 李远 张皓 李念云 孟捷 CHEN An;XIE Xue-qian;WANG Zheng;LI Yuan;ZHANG Hao;LI Nian-yun;MENG Jie(Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200080,China)
出处 《CT理论与应用研究(中英文)》 2018年第6期700-707,共8页 Computerized Tomography Theory and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81471662) 科技部国际合作项目(2016YFE0103000)
关键词 冠状动脉CT成像 低剂量扫描 冠状动脉狭窄 coronary CT angiography low-dose scan coronary stenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1Slovis TL. The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality?[J]. Radiology, 2002, 223(1): 5-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2231012100.
  • 2Zheng M, Wu Y, Wei M, et al. Low-concentration contrast medium for 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography at a very low radiation dose using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition[J]. Acad Radiol, 2015, 22(2): 195-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.07.025.
  • 3Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, et al. A low tube voltage technique reduces the radiation dose at retrospective ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography for anatomical and functional analyses[J]. Acad Radiol, 2011, 18(8): 991-999. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.03.007.
  • 4Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study[J]. Radiology, 2011, 261(3): 779-786. DOI:10.1148/radiol.11110606.
  • 5Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2009, 3(3): 190-204. DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.03.004.
  • 6Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 1975, 51(4 Suppl): 5-40.
  • 7Manke C, Marcus C, Page A, et al. Pain in femoral arteriography. A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270 mg I/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers[J]. Acta Radiol, 2003,44(6):590-596. DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-0455.2003.00129.x.
  • 8Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(11): 3141-3145. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.012.
  • 9Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy[J]. Eur Heart J, 2008, 29(6): 766-776. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn044.
  • 10Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation[J]. Radiology, 2005, 236(2): 661-665. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2362040468.

共引文献91

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部