期刊文献+

企业财务风险衍化及其产业效应——基于规制环境和竞争环境的双重情境分析 被引量:32

The Derivation and Industrial Effect of Corporate Financial Risk:A Scenario Analysis Based on Regulation and Competition
原文传递
导出
摘要 在"市场机制有效、微观主体有活力、宏观调控有度"的经济体制改革背景下,本文以我国规制环境和竞争环境为场域,分析了企业财务风险衍化的规律及其产业效应。使用"十五计划"至"十二五规划"间中国沪深两市所有A股上市公司数据的实证检验发现:较强的政府规制和产业竞争都会深化单个企业财务风险,且竞争机制强化了规制机制的作用。进一步地,在我国,单个企业财务风险横向衍化在其所在产业中主要发挥了竞争效应;且集中度较高的竞争环境会强化这种竞争效应,而较强规制环境则会削弱之。与之前诸多研究认为政府规制干预了市场和企业效率发挥的观点不同,本文认为政府规制一方面抑制了财务风险在产业中的传染;另一方面能够防止竞争效应的扩大可能带来的"大鱼吃小鱼"的垄断滋生。 This paper taking the regulatory environment and competitive environment as a context,analyzes the pattern of the corporate financial risk derivation and its industrial effect. An empirical research using data from all the A-share listed companies during the period of "10th Five-Year Plan"to"12th Five-Year Plan"found that: Strong regulation and competition will both deepen corporate financial risk,and there is a mutually reinforcing relationship between these two mechanisms. Further,the horizontal derivation of an individual companys financial risk exerts a competitive effect on the whole industry. A highly concentrated competitive environment will strength this competitive effect,and a stronger regulatory environment will weaken it. This paper argues that government regulations,on the one hand,inhibit the contagion of financial risks in the industry;on the other hand,it prevents the monopoly that may be brought about by the expansion of competitive effects.
作者 王诗雨 陈志红 Wang Shiyu;Chen Zhihong
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第11期56-62,共7页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"政府规制 产品市场竞争网络与企业财务风险衍化"(71872040)的资助
关键词 财务风险衍化 产业效应 规制环境 竞争环境 Financial Risk Derivation Industrial Effect Regulatory Environment Competitive Environment
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈冬华,李真,新夫.2010,《产业政策与公司融资——来自中国的经验证据》.2010中国会计与财务研究国际研讨会.
  • 2Aghion, P. , M. Dewatripont, L. Du, A. Harrison, and P. Legros, 2012, "Industrial Policy and Competition", NBER Working Paper, No. w18048.
  • 3Austin, D. H. , 1993, "An Event-study Approach to Measuring Innovative Output: the Case of Biotechnology", American Economic Review, 83 ( 83 ), 253--58.
  • 4Dosi, G. , L. Marengo, and C. Pasquali, 2006, " How Much Should Society Fuel the Greed of Innovators.'? On the Relations Between Appropriability, Opportunities and Rates of Innovation", Research Policy, 35 (8) : 1110--1121.
  • 5Hall, B. H. , and D. Harhoff, 2012, "Recent Research on the Economics of Patents", Annual Review of Economics, 4( 1 ) : 541--565.
  • 6Lall, S. , 2001, "Comparing National Competitive Performance: An Economic Analysis of World Economic Forum's Competitiveness Index", QEH Working Paper, 7, 61--102.
  • 7Lee, J. W. , 1996, "Government Interventions and Productivity Growth in Korean Manufacturing Industries", Journal of Economic Growth, 1 : 391--414.
  • 8Powell, B. , 2005, "State Development Planning: Did It Create An East Asian Miracle.'?", Review of Austrian Economics, 18, 3--4: 305 --323.
  • 9Slnchez, M. Carol, 2000, "Motives for Corporate Philanthropy in E1 Salvador: Ahruism and Political Legitimacy", Journal of Business Ethics, 27 (4) : 363--375.
  • 10Shleifer, A. , and R. Vishny, 1994, "Politicians and Firms", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (4) : 995--1025.

共引文献2640

同被引文献453

引证文献32

二级引证文献241

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部