期刊文献+

策略与方法:整理国故与新国学的几个问题 被引量:1

Strategies and Methods: Sorting Out the Issues of National Cultural Heritage and New Sinology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 整理国故是新文化运动的倡导者所寻找到的与"五四"新文化相关的另一链条,其一端连接着新文化运动,另一端连接着科学的方法和精神。整理国故成为新国学产生的坚实的基础,新国学是在整理国故过程中提出并形成的,因而,新国学与"五四"新文化运动既存在某些关联,而又是不同特质的两种文化体系。惟其如此,发生在"五四"新文化运动之后的几场文化论战,往往是错位的,各自从不同角度对新国学的建立阐述自己的理解。各种不同声音、不同观点相互交锋,整理国故与反整理国故、整理国故与保存国粹等问题,概念与方法、范畴与认识等问题,使本来就容易混淆的问题,在反思与转向、辨析与论争中逐渐失去整理国故讨论的意义,国学失去了应有的逻辑,新国学也在各种声音中被湮没。 Sorting out national cultural heritage is another chain that the advocators of the New Cultural Movement tried to find to be connected to the "May 4 th"New Cultural Movement,with New Cultural Movement at one end and the scientific method and spirit at the other. Sorting out the national heritage has become a solid foundation for the emergence of the new sinology,which was proposed and formed in the process of sorting out the national cultural heritage. Therefore,the new sinology and the "May4 th"New Cultural Movement had something in common while these two systems had very different characteristics. As such,the cultural debates that took place after the "May 4 th " New Cultural Movement were often improperly arranged,each explaining its own understanding of the establishment of the modern sinology. In the process of introspection and change of direction,differentiation and analysis and debates,issues such as the confrontation among different voices and among different points of views,the concept for sorting out the national cultural heritage or against it,sorting out national cultural heritage or preserving national quintessence, concepts and methods, category and understanding made the originally and easily confusing situation gradually losing the significance of the discussion of sorting out national heritage. The new sinology lost the meaning of sorting out national cultural heritage;the traditional sinology lost its logic;the new sinology was neglected in such chaos.
作者 周海波 Zhou Haibo(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Qingdao University,Qingdao,Shandong,266071)
机构地区 青岛大学文学院
出处 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期1-11,共11页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 作者主持研究的国家社科基金重大项目"中国现代文学文体理论整理汇编与研究(1902-1949)"(17ZDA275) 山东省2015年弘扬中华优秀传统文化重点研究项目"新国学与中国传统文化的现代转型及其价值辨析研究"(15BZBJ08)的阶段性成果
关键词 整理国故 新国学 科学方法 “五四”新文化运动 sorting out the national cultural heritage new sinology scientific methods "May 4th" New Cultural Movement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献56

  • 1林辰.鲁迅辑录《古小说钩沈》的成就及其特色[J].文学评论,1962(6):116-124. 被引量:4
  • 2周质平.评胡适的提倡科学与整理国故[J].近代史研究,1992(1):157-170. 被引量:7
  • 3顾颉刚.圣贤文化与民众文化[J].民俗周刊,1928,(5).
  • 4鲁迅.《通讯》[J].猛进,1925,(3).
  • 5钱玄同:《钱玄同致鲁迅、周作人》,1918年12月25日,《鲁迅、许广平所藏书信选》,湖南文艺出版社,1987年版,第18页.
  • 6燃(吴稚晖).《前行<中国新语凡例>注》[J].新世纪,1908,40.
  • 7鲁迅:《致许寿裳》,1919年1月16日,《鲁迅全集》(第11卷),人民文学出版社,2005年版,第369页.
  • 8鲁迅:《聊答“……”》,《京报副刊》,1925年3月5日.
  • 9吴稚晖:《箴洋八股化之理学》,《晨报副刊》,1923年7月23日.
  • 10顾颉刚:《顾颉刚遗札·与伯祥书》,1919年8月14日,《学术集林(卷一)》,上海远东出版社,1994年版,第258页.

共引文献18

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部