基于SCI数据库的围手术期用药研究文献计量分析

Bibliometric Analysis of Perioperative Medication Based on Web of Science Databases

目的:分析围手术期用药的研究现状及特点,为今后的研究提供参考。方法:检索Web of Sciences数据库,用文献计量方法分析围手术期用药相关研究的年发文量及引文数、国家和地区、作者机构、基金、期刊、文献研究内容及被引情况。结果:共检索并筛选得到1 397篇文献,文献发表量及引文数呈现上升趋势;美国发文量排名第一,占33. 86%,且研究机构多来自美国。我国发文量位居第六,但影响力较低。文献分布于175种期刊,发文量前10位期刊的平均影响因子为2. 813,38. 73%的文献受基金资助。镇痛药及抗菌药为围手术期用药研究的热点药物。69. 94%的文献对临床患者围手术期的用药进行研究,其中仅有12. 28%针对特殊人群。2009年后开始出现药师对临床围手术期用药进行干预的文献,对围手术期用药的管理及干预方法进行了探索。结论:围手术期用药的相关研究稳步开展,美国处于领先地位,中国较其仍有一定差距。各类型研究总体质量偏低,仍需引起持续关注。

Objective:To analyze the research status and characteristics of perioperative medication,so as to provide reference for future studies.Methods:The literatures about perioperative medication were searched from the database of Web of Sciences.The searching results were analyzed using bibliometric method from the article numbers,countries/districts,author institutions,fund,journal distribution,content and highly cited literatures.Results:A total of 1 397 articles were retrieved and screened.The total number of publications and citations showed an upward trend.USA had the largest number of publications accounting for 33.86%of all the related publications,and the research institutions were mostly from the United States.China ranked the sixth in the number of documents issued,while the influence was low.The literatures were distributed in 175 journals.The average impact factor of the top 10 journals issued was 2.813,and 38.73%of the documents were supported by funds.Analgesics and antibiotics were the hotspot drugs for research.Totally 69.94%of the articles studied perioperative medications in clinical patients,of which only 12.28%were targeted at specific populations.After 2009,pharmacists began to intervene in clinical perioperative medication and explore management and intervention methods for perioperative drug use.Conclusion:The related researches on perioperative medication are being steadily carried out,and the United States is in a leading position.There is still a certain gap between China and other countries.The overall quality of all types of researches is low,and sustained attention is still warranted.