期刊文献+

双渠道背景下低碳供应链决策及渠道合作策略 被引量:18

Low Carbon Supply Chain Decision-making and Channel Cooperation under Dual Channel Background
原文传递
导出
摘要 考虑消费者低碳偏好和渠道偏好属性,在制造商主导的两级供应链下,构建制造商未开通线上渠道、制造商开通线上渠道以及制造商开通线上渠道且共享收益这三种情景下的低碳供应链决策模型。研究发现,制造商开通线上直销渠道会带来碳排放水平的提高和制造商利润的增加,当偏好线上渠道的消费者比例达到一定水平,零售商的利润受损。当制造商开通线上直销渠道且共享收益给零售商时,存在一个收益共享比例区间,能够同时实现碳减排水平、制造商和零售商利润的Pareto改善。最后,通过数值算例分析了消费者低碳偏好系数、线上偏好比例以及交叉价格弹性等参数的敏感性,并验证了制造商共享收益的策略有效性。 Considering consumers’low-carbon preferences and channel preference attributes,this paper constructs a low carbon supply chain decision model with the manufacturer do not open online channels,the manufacturer open online channels,and the manufacture open online channels and revenue shared under the two-tier supply chain structure dominated by the manufacturer respectively.Result shows that the manufacturer opening online direct sales channels will bring about higher carbon emission levels and improve the manufacturer’s profit.When the proportion of consumers who prefer to online channels reaches a certain level,the retailer’s profit will be damaged.There is a profit-sharing ratio range,in which the carbon emission reduction level and the manufacturer’s profit as well as the retailer’s profit can achieve Pareto improvement simultaneously.Finally,the sensitivities of system parameters such as low-carbon preference coefficients,online preference ratios,and cross-price elasticity are analyzed by the numerical examples.The effectiveness of the strategy with the manufacturer sharing revenue is verified.
作者 刘名武 许以撒 付红 LIU Ming-wu;XU Yi-sa;FU Hong(School of Economics and Management,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074;School of Management,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009)
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期105-111,共7页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71531003) 重庆市哲学社会科学规划项目(2018sjd01) 重庆市科委基础与前沿研究项目(cstc2018jcyjAX0137)
关键词 双渠道供应链 低碳产品 定价策略 收益分享 dual channel supply chain low carbon product pricing policy revenue sharing
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献70

  • 1陈云,王浣尘,沈惠璋.电子商务零售商与传统零售商的价格竞争研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(1):35-41. 被引量:133
  • 2胡怡琳.苏宁:渠道商的影响力[N].经济观察报,2010-07-17.
  • 3Vagstad S. Centralized vs decentralized procurement: does dispersed information call for decentralized decision-making? [ J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2000, 18 (6) : 949 : 964.
  • 4Cachon G P. Supply chain coordination with contracts [ M ]. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003, 229 : 339.
  • 5Zimmer K. Supply chain coordination with uncertain just-in-time delivery [ J ]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2002, 77(1) : 1 -15.
  • 6Qi X T, Bard J F, Yu G. Supply chain coordination with demand disruptions[J]. Omega, 2004, 32(4) : 301 :312.
  • 7Li J L, Liu L W. Supply chain coordination with quantity discount policy [ J ]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 101 ( 1 ) : 89 -98.
  • 8Cachon G P, K:k A G. Competing manufacturers in a retail supply chain: on contractual form and coordination [ J ]. Management Science, 2010, 56 (3) : 571 - 589.
  • 9Loch C H, Wu Y Z. Social preferences and supply chain performance: an experimental study [ J ]. Management Science, 2008, 54(11) : 1835 -1849.
  • 10Ruffle B J. More is better, but fair is fair: tipping in dictator and ultimatum games[ J]. Game and Economic Behavior, 1998, 23(2): 247:265.

共引文献203

同被引文献145

引证文献18

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部