期刊文献+

2017年山东省千佛山医院临床病原菌分布和耐药性分析 被引量:1

Analysis of clinical pathogen distribution and drug resistance in Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital in 2017
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解2017年山东千佛山医院临床细菌分离株的分布及耐药性,为临床合理使用抗生素提供依据.方法:通过Bruker MALDI-TOF、Walkaway 96 plus或VITEK-2 Compact自动化细菌鉴定仪进行细菌鉴定,纸片扩散法、Walkaway 96 plus或VITEK-2 Compact自动化药敏系统进行药物敏感性测定.药敏按照2016年CLSIM100中规定的折点,使用WHONET 5.6软件分析数据.结果:2017年1月~12月共检出6511株临床分离株,其中革兰氏阴性菌和革兰阳性球菌分别占74.5%和25.5%.前五种病原体分别是大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌.对甲氧西林耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(MRCNS)分离率分别为25.5%和77.6%.没有检测到对万古霉素,替考拉宁或利奈唑胺耐药的葡萄球菌.4.3%的屎肠球菌菌株对万古霉素耐药.分离出239株耐碳青霉烯的肠杆菌科细菌,占所有肠杆菌科分离株的8.5%.不动杆菌属对亚胺培南和美罗培南耐药率分别为81.7%和83%.铜绿假单胞菌对亚胺培南和美罗培南的耐药率分别为34.2%和32.4%.结论:我院的多重耐药细菌形势严峻,应加强医院感染控制和抗菌药物临床使用管理,保持良好的细菌耐药性监测. Objective: To investigate the distribution and antimicrobial resistanee profile of clinical bacterial isolates in Qianfoshan Hospital ofShandong Province in 2017, so as to provide information for guiding the rational use ofantibiotics in clinical practice. Methods: Bacteria identification was performed by Bmker MALDI—TOF, Walkaway 96 plus or the VITEK—— Compact automatic identification system. Disk diffusion susceptibility testing, Walkaway 96 plus or VITEK —— Compact automatic identification system were used to determine the susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. The results were analyzed according to CLSI 2016 breakpoints.AU data were analyzed using WHONET 5.6 software. Results: A total of 6511 clinical isolates were collected fromJanuary to December 2017, ofwhich gram-negative organisms and gram -positive cocci accounted for 74.5% and 25.5%, respectively. The top five pathogens were E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. aureus. The prevalence ofmethicillin—resistant S aureus (MRSA) and coagulase negative staphylococcus (MRCNS) was 25.5% and 77.6% respectively. No staphylococcal strains were resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin or linezolid. 4.3% of E. faecium strains were resistant to vancomycin. 239 strains of carbapenem —resistant Enterobacteriaceae were isolated, which accounted for 8.5% of all the Enterobacteriaceae isolates. About 81.7% and 83% of Acinetobacter spp. strains were resistant to iniipenem and nieropenerrL With respect to P aeruginosa, the resistance rates to iinipenem and meropenem were 34.2% and 32.4%, respectively. Conclusion: The prevalence of multi —drug resistant bacteria is high in our hospital. It is necessary to strengthen hospital infection control and management ofclinical use ofantimicrobial agents, and maintain good practice in surveillance ofbacterial resistance.
作者 马建萍 李晓凤 郝明巨 MA Jian-ping;LI Xiao-feng;HAO Ming-ju(Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Jinan 250014)
出处 《医学检验与临床》 2018年第11期24-29,48,共7页 Medical Laboratory Science and Clinics
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目2017WS007.
关键词 病原菌 药敏试验 耐药性分析 Clinical bacterial isolates Antimicrobialsusceptibility test Antimicrobial resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1王辉,俞云松,王明贵,倪语星,马越,任健康,韩锟,卓超,徐英春,胡云建,胡志东,曹彬,罗燕萍,褚云卓,廖康,康梅,张冀霞.替加环素体外药敏试验操作规程专家共识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2013,36(7):584-587. 被引量:134
  • 2胡付品,朱德妹,汪复,蒋晓飞,徐英春,张小江,张朝霞,季萍,谢轶,康梅,王传清,王爱敏,徐元宏,沈继录,孙自镛,陈中举,倪语星,孙景勇,褚云卓,田素飞,胡志东,李金,俞云松,林洁,单斌,杜艳,郭素芳,魏莲花,吴玲,张泓,王春,胡云建,艾效曼,卓超,苏丹虹,汪瑞忠,房华,俞碧霞,赵勇,龚萍.2015年CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2016,16(6):685-694. 被引量:390
  • 3胡付品,郭燕,朱德妹,汪复,蒋晓飞,徐英春,张小江,张朝霞,季萍,谢轶,康梅,王传清,王爱敏,徐元宏,沈继录,孙自镛,陈中举,倪语星,孙景勇,褚云卓,田素飞,胡志东,李金,俞云松,林洁,单斌,杜艳,郭素芳,魏莲花,邹凤梅,张泓,王春,胡云建,艾效曼,卓超,苏丹虹,汪瑞忠,房华,俞碧霞,赵勇,龚萍,郭大文,赵金英,刘文恩,李艳明,金炎,邵春红,温开镇,张贻荣,徐雪松,鄢超,喻华,黄湘宁,王山梅,楚亚菲,张利侠,马娟,周树平,周艳,朱镭,孟晋华.2016年中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2017,17(5):481-491. 被引量:778
  • 4张裕珍,张琳,金炎,王月玲,邵春红.2016年山东省立医院细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2017,17(5):576-583. 被引量:9

二级参考文献22

  • 1Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-first informational supplement. MI00-S22. Wayne, PA:CLSI,2012.
  • 2European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version I. I, 2010-04-27.
  • 3Jones RN, Ferraro MJ, Reller LB, et al. Multicenter studies of tigecycline disk diffusion susceptibility results for Acinetobacter spp.J Clin Microbiol,2007 ,45 :227-230.
  • 4Fernrindez-Mazarrasa C, Mazarrasa 0, CalvoJ, et al. High concerntration of mananese in Mueller-Hinton agar increase MICs of tigecyc:line determined by Etest.J Clin Microbiol, 2009, 47: 827-829.
  • 5Bradford PA, Petersen PJ, Young M, et al. Tigecycline MIC testing by broth dilution requires use of fresh medium or addition of the biocatalytic oxygen-reducing reagent oxyrase to standardize the test method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother ,2005,49 :3903-3909.
  • 6Curcio D, Fernandez F. Comment on: Effect of different Mueller?Hinton agars on tigecycline disc diffusion susceptibility for Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemother ,2008,62: 1166-1167.
  • 7Casal M, Rodriguez F,Johnson B, et al. Influence of testing methodology on the tigecycline activity profile against presumably tigecycline-nan-susceptible Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemather, 2009, 64:69-72.
  • 8Zarkotou 0, Pournaras S, Altouvas G, et al. Comparative evaluation of tigecycline susceptibility testing methods far expanded-spectrum cephalosporin and carbapenem-resistant gram?negative pathogens.J Clin Microbiol, 2012, 50 :3747-3750.
  • 9LiuJW, Ko WC, Huang CH, et al. Agreement assessment of tigecycline susceptibilities determined by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods among commonly encountered resistant bacterial isolates: results from the Tigecycline In Vitro Surveillance in Taiwan (TIST) study, 2008 to 2010. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2012, 56:1414-1417.
  • 10Huang TD, Berhin C, Bogaerts P, et al. In vitro susceptibility of multi drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates to tigecycline.J Antimicrob Chemother, 2012, 67 :2696-2699.

共引文献1174

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部