期刊文献+

68例原发肠道弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的不同分期系统比较及预后分析 被引量:8

Comparison of Different Staging Systems and Prognostic Analysis in 68 Cases of Primary Intestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比不同分期系统在原发肠道弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤中的预后判断能力和分析其临床病理学特点、治疗与预后的相关性。方法:2009年1月至2017年7月原发肠道DLBCL患者共68例,所有患者均经过手术治疗。对患者分别使用Lugano分期、TNM分期、Blackledg分期及Musshoff分期系统进行分期;采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线并行log-rank检验;应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价4个分期系统对生存率的预测价值;分析患者的临床特征、不同分期、治疗方案与生存预后的相关性。结果:患者的中位随访时间为52 (1-105)个月,中位PFS时间为41(1-86)个月,中位OS时间未能达到。常见发病部位为回盲部(30. 9%),其次为小肠(29. 4%)和结肠(29. 4%)、多部位受累(7. 4%)和直肠(2. 94%)。患者5年PFS率和OS率分别为44. 9%和51. 1%,KaplanMeier生存曲线及Log-rank检验结果显示,应用不同的分期系统描述PI-DLBCL患者PFS和OS的累积活存率时,4种分期系统均不能明显的区分开各期的生存曲线; ROC曲线结果显示,Lugano分期系统对PI-DLBCL患者1年PFS(AUC=0. 826; P=0. 015)和1年OS(AUC=0. 792; P=0. 001)预测能力较其他分期系统好。手术联合化疗(±放疗)组(62例)与单纯手术组(6例) 3年PFS率分别为53. 9%、16. 7%(P=0. 116),3年OS率分别为66. 7%、16. 7%(P=0. 015);联合利妥昔单克隆抗体化疗组(36例)较未联合化疗组(26例) 3年PFS率分别为66. 0%、44.0%(P=0. 139),3年OS分别为70. 2%和39. 2%(P=0. 148)。回盲部患者较其他部位发病患者有较高的PFS和OS(P均<0. 05)。多因素分析显示,仅骨髓侵犯是影响患者PFS的独立预后因素(P <0. 05)。结论:对于原发肠道DLBCL患者,骨髓侵犯是影响患者PFS的独立危险因素。从本组有限的数据初步得出,在4个分期系统中,Lugano分期对PI-DLBCL患者生存率的预测能力优于其它分期系统,可考虑将其作为PI-DLBCL生存率的预测指标。 Objective: To compare the prognostic value of different staging systems in primary intestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma( PI-DLPCL),and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics,treatment and prognosis of PI-DLBCL. Methods: A total of 68 patients w ith PI-DLBCL w ere recruited from January 2009 to July 2017. All the patients underw ent staging by using TNM,Lugano,Blackledge and M usshoff system,survival curves for the PI-DLBCL patients w ere plotted using the Kaplan-M eier method and w ere judged by the log-rank test. The accuracy of each staging system for predicting survival of PI-DLBCL patients w as evaluated by calculating the area under curve( AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic( ROC). The correlation of the 4 staging systems,clinical features patients and treatment regimes w ith PFS and OS w ere analysed. Results: The median follow-up time w as 52( 1-105) months,the median PFS time w as 41( 1-86) months,patients did not reached the median OS time. The most frequently involved site w as ileocecal( 30. 9%),follow ed by small intestine( 29. 4%) and colon( 29. 4%),multiple sites involvement( 7. 4%)and rectum( 2. 94%). The PFS and OS rates at 5-year w ere 44. 9% and 51. 1%,respectively. Kaplan-M eier survival curves and log-rank test results show ed that using different staging systems to describe the cumulative retention rates of PFS and OS in PI-DLBCL patients,none of the 4 staging systems can distinguish the survival curves of each stage significantly. The results of ROC curve show ed that the prediction ability of the Lugano staging system w as better than other staging system for 1 year PFS( AUC = 0. 826;P = 0. 015) and 1 year OS( AUC = 0. 792;P = 0. 001) in PI-DLBCL patients. The 3 year PFS rate in the operation + chemo or radio-therapy group( 62 cases) and the single operation group( 6 cases) were 53. 9% and 16. 7%,respectively( P = 0. 116),The 3 year OS rate were 66. 7% and 16. 7%( P = 0.015),respectively. Patients w ho received chemotherapy combined w ith rituximab had a higher 3-year PFS( 66. 0% vs44. 0%,P = 0. 139) and 3-year OS( 70. 2% vs 39. 2%,P = 0. 148). The patients w ith ileocecal lesion had higher PFS rate and OS rate than other sites( P < 0. 05). M ultivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that only bone marrow invasion w as an independent prognostic factor in patients w ith PFS. Conclusion: Bone marrow invasion is an independent risk factor for PFS in patients w ith PI-DLBCL,according to this limited preliminary data,Lugano staging system for stratifying and predicting the prognosis of PI-DLBCL patients is better than other staging system.
作者 王希 王超雨 许雯 杨洪亮 赵海丰 王晓芳 王亚非 于泳 张翼鷟 WANG Xi;WANG Chao-Yu;XU Wen;YANG Hong-Liang;ZHAO Hai-Feng;WANG Xiao-Fang;WANG Ya-Fei;YU Yong;ZHANG Yi-Zhuo(Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy in Tianjin ,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Tianjin 300060,China)
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第1期52-60,共9页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81570201)
关键词 淋巴瘤 弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤 肠道 淋巴瘤分期系统 淋巴瘤预后 lymphoma diffuse large B cells lymphoma intestinal tract lymphoma staging lymphoma prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1Kobayashi Y, Hatta Y, Hojo A, et al. Long-term follow-up of lo- calized, primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituxhnab and CHOP[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2012, 3(2):304-308.
  • 2Koch P, del Valle F, Berdel WE, et al. Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: I. Anatomic and histologic distribu- tion, clinical features, and survival data of 371 patients registered in the German Mulficenter Study G1T NHL 01/92[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(18):3861-3873.
  • 3Kim SJ, Choi CW, Mun YC, et al. Multicenter retrospective analy- sis of 581 patients with primary intestinal non-hodgkin lymphoma from the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL) [J]. BMC Cancer, 2011, 11:321.
  • 4HuangJ, Jiang W, Xu R, et al. Primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Chinese patients: clinical characteristics and prognos- tic factors[J]. BMC Cancer, 2010,10:358.
  • 5Rohatiner A, d'Amore F, Coifiler B, et al. Report on a workshop convened to discuss the pathological and staging classifications of gastrointestinal tract lymphoma[J]. Ann Oncol, 1994, 5 (5):397-400.
  • 6Ruskone-Fourmestraux A, Dragosics B, Morgner A, et al. Paris staging system for primary gastrointesmlal lymphomas[J]. Gut, 2003, 52(6):912-916.
  • 7Li X, Xia B, Guo S, et al. A retrospective analysis of primary gas- tric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with or without concomitant mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue(MALT) lymphoma compo- nents[J]. Ann Hematol, 2013, 92(6):807-815.
  • 8Lee HS, Park LC, Lee EM, et al. Comparison of Therapeutic Out- comes Between Surgical Resection Followed By R-CHOP and R- CHOP Alone for Localized Primary Intestinal Diffuse Large B- cell Lyrnphoma[J]. AmJ Clin Oncol, 2014, 37(2):182-187.
  • 9Ding D, Pei W, Chen W, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of 46 patients with primary gas- trointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2014, 2 (2) :259-264.
  • 10Mehmet K, Sener C, Uyeturk U, et al.Treatment modalities in pri- mary gastric lymphoma: the effect of rituximab and surgical treat- ment. A study by the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology[J]. Contemp Oncol (Pozn), 2014, 18(4):273-278.

共引文献17

同被引文献56

引证文献8

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部