期刊文献+

脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉在新式剖宫产术中的应用 被引量:5

COMBINED SPINAL AND EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN SECTION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 ①目的 探讨脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉 (CSEA)在新式剖宫产术中的应用效果。②方法 将 2 0 0例足月健康产妇随机分为CSEA组和连续硬膜外麻醉 (EA)对照组 ,每组 10 0例 ,均以L2~ 3 为穿刺点 ,CSEA组用带有背孔的Tuohy针和 2 5G腰穿针穿刺。③结果 CSEA组麻醉效果明显优于EA组 (u =7.6 6 ,P <0 .0 5 ) ,局麻药用量显著减少 (t=4 .6 2 ,P <0 .0 1) ,手术时间和麻醉诱导时间亦明显缩短 (t=2 .0 5 ,3.82 ,P <0 .0 5 ) ,两组低血压发生率相似 ,但CSEA组血压下降程度较大。④结论 CSEA具有麻醉起效快、用药剂量少、效果好和手术时间短等优点。但应注意低血压的防治。 Objective To observe the efficacy of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA)for cesarean section. Methods 200 healthy full term puerpera were randomly divided into two groups: Group One (experimental group, n =100) for CSEA and Group Two(control group, n =100)for continuous epidural anesthesia. The puncture point in both groups was between L 2~3 . A Tuohy needle with back hole and 25G lumbar puncture needle were used for Group One. \ Results\ The effect of anesthesia in Group One was much better than that of Group Two ( u=7.66 ,P <0.05), and much less local anesthetic was used ( t=4.62, P <0.01). The operative duration as well as anesthesia inducement were much shorter ( t=2.05, 3.82, P <0.05). Though the possibility of hypotension was similar in both groups, the blood pressure of Group One dropped greater in extent. \ Conclusion CSEA possesses such advantages as instant action ,smaller dose, better results and shortening of operative duration. However, due attention should be paid to the prevention and management of hypotension.
出处 《齐鲁医学杂志》 2002年第1期41-42,共2页 Medical Journal of Qilu
关键词 脊髓麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 剖宫产术 anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, epidural cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1胡立 翁铭庆(译).妇科手术图谱[M].广州:广东科学技术出版社,1996.181-188.

共引文献23

同被引文献7

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部