对象世界与关系世界——席勒的审美教育思想与巴赫金狂欢化思想比较

Objective World and Connective World ——A Contrast between Schiller'S theory of aesthetic education and Bahtin'S revelry theory

通过对席勒的审美教育思想和巴赫金的狂欢化理论的比较研究,指出,虽然二者有着共同的人性乌托邦色彩,但它们基于的哲学观念是很不相同的,席勒的是康德哲学,而巴赫金的则是宗教哲学。因此,他们所期许的人和世界的关系是不同的,前者,人生活在对象世界中,试图通过审美最终把握对象,克服对象;而后者,人时时步入一种关系世界,寻求第二个世界,但也不排斥对象的世界,这是一种更符合人性的乌托邦。

Through a detailed comparison between schiller抯 theory of aesthetic education and Bahtin抯 revelry theory, this article suggests that though both the two theories derived from the utopia theory, they have totally different philosophic bases and therefore expect different relationship between the human being and the surrounding world. Schiller抯 theory have Kent抯 idea as its bases and believes that people live in the world and manage to grasp and conquer the objective world through aesthetic while Bahtin抯 theory is religious and it emphasizes that though people step into the connective world every now and then, they do not reject the objective world and thus it is more humane.