期刊文献+

试论教育政策研究分类的理论基础 被引量:8

On the Theoretical Base of Classification of Educational Policy Researches
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文针对目前我国教育政策研究理论基础薄弱和实践范围或类别狭窄的现状,提出拓展范围与丰富基础理论是我国教育政策研究面临的挑战。在评价众多教育政策学者的分类法的基础上,尝试将教育政策研究在技术操作性层面上分为四大类。进而,笔者以更高层次的社会观和科学观为依据,重点评述了占据当今国内外教育政策研究主流的六大理论流派。
作者 谢少华
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第1期83-90,共8页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1[1]B. Haynes(1987). Educational Policy Studies: Guide, produced by Edith Cowan University for WADEC,p. 10.
  • 2[2]I. Gordon, J. Lewis & K. Young(1977). Perspectives on Policy Analysis, in Public Administration Bulletin,25, pp. 26 - 35.
  • 3[3]J. G. Cibulka(1994). Pllicy Analysis and the Study of Education,in Journal of Education Policy 9,5 - 6,p. 107(Special Issue: The Study of Educational Ploitics , Politics of Education Association Yearbook 1994).
  • 4[4]J. J. Prunty(1984). A Critical Reformulation of Educational Policy Analysis, Victoria: Deakin University, P. 8.
  • 5[5]S. Taylor, F. Rizvi, B. Lingard & M. Henry(1997). Educational policy and the ploitics of change, Routledge, 11, New Fetter Lane, London, p. 37.
  • 6[6]T. Kuhn(1962). The Structure of&.ientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • 7[7]G. Burrell & G. Morgan ( 1979 ). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemann, p. 10.
  • 8[8]G. Morgan (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory, Administrative Science Quarterly,25(4),pp.605 - 22.
  • 9[9][10]G. Burrell & G. Morgan(1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemann, p. 3, p. 22.
  • 10[11]T. Dye(1978). Understanding Public Policy, 3rd edn, Prentice-Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ.

同被引文献62

引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部