期刊文献+

精神障碍诊断量表对偏执型和未定型精神分裂症患者的评定 被引量:2

Application of Diagnostic Schedule of Mental Disorders in schizophrenia of paranoid and undifferentiated type
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 验证精神障碍诊断量表 (DSMD)对偏执型及未定型精神分裂症的临床诊断价值。方法 对经三级查房确诊的 332例偏执型及未定型精神分裂症住院患者 ,应用与中国精神疾病分类方案与诊断标准第 2版修订本 (CCMD 2 R)相配套的DSMD进行测评。结果  (1)偏执型组的怪异外表 (15 7% )、情感交流障碍 (5 1 2 % )、个人卫生差 (36 1% )、不合作 (2 0 5 % )的比例低于未定型组 (分别为 30 7%、78 9%、4 8 8%、31 9% ;P <0 0 1和P <0 0 5 ) ;两组感知障碍的差异无显著性 ;偏执型组情感平淡 (5 6 6 % )、情感不协调 (41 0 % )的比例低于未定型组 (84 9%、5 8 4 % ;P <0 0 1) ,而敌意则相反 (为 30 7% :19 9% ;P <0 0 5 ) ;偏执型组行为怪异的比例 (31 9% )低于未定型组 (42 8% ;P <0 0 5 )。 (2 )偏执型组的妄想观念 (92 8% )及被害妄想 (6 8 7% )等的比例高于未定型组 (分别为 79 5 %和 4 8 2 % ;P <0 0 1和P <0 0 5 )。 (3)两组患者社会功能的受损程度均较严重 ,以未定型组为著。结论 DSMD有助于对偏执型与未定型精神分裂症的鉴别诊断。 Objective To evaluate the utility of Diagnostic Schedule of Mental Disorders (DSMD) in the diagnosis of paranoid and undifferentiated schizophrenia Methods Three hundred and thirty two inpatients with schizophrenia who met with the Chinese Classification for Mental Disease (CCMD Ⅱ R) criteria for paranoid or undifferentiated type were assessed with DSMD Results The diagnostic criteria of DSMD matched well with CCMD Ⅱ R The rates and severity of odd behaviors (30 7%) and poor personal hygiene (48 8%) in undifferentiated type were higher than that in paranoid type (15 7% and 36 1%; P <0 01) The rate of delusion in paranoid type was higher than that in unclassified type (92 8% vs 79 5%, χ 2=12 3, P <0 01), and both the groups had similar occurrence rates of hallucination The social function of the patients in both groups was impaired seriously Conclusion DSMD is reliable and validate,and it can be used in clinical diagnosis and research to differentiate paranoid and undifferentiated type of schizophrenia
出处 《中华精神科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第2期107-110,共4页 Chinese Journal of Psychiatry
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1陈彦方 马登岱.抗精神病电疗[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,1992.81-145.
  • 2陈荣民.影响精神分裂症疗效和预后因素的初步探讨[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19:47-47.
  • 3赵崇德.600例精神分裂症不同年代的临床症状对比分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1983,9:279-279.
  • 4徐韬园 陆明康 等.偏执型精神分裂症的临床及随访[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1983,9:69-69.

共引文献9

同被引文献12

  • 1肖春玲,陈彦方,韦君美,江永华.精神分裂症患者185例的ICD-10、CCMD-2-R与CCMD-2诊断比较[J].临床精神医学杂志,1996,6(3):170-171. 被引量:3
  • 2世界卫生组织.ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.190-196.
  • 3陈彦方 马登岱.抗精神病电疗[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,1992.81-145.
  • 4[2]American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[M].The forth edition(DSM-IV).Washington DC:1994,273-295
  • 5[3]WHO.Schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCAN)[M].WHO Geneva,1992
  • 6[4]First MB,Spitzer RL,Gibbon M,et al.Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-Ⅳ Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition(SCID-I/P)(Version 2.0)[M].New York:Biometrics Research Department,New York State Psychiatic Institute,1998,67-100(中文版)
  • 7[5]中华医学会精神科学分会等.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第2版修订版(CCMD-2-R)[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1995,57-61
  • 8[9]中华神经精神科学会等.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001,75-78
  • 9American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, the forth edition ( DSM-Ⅳ). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994:273 - 295.
  • 10First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al. Structured clinical interview for DSM-Ⅳ axis Ⅰ disorders - patient edition (SCID-I/P) ( version 2.0). New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1998:67 - 100.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部