期刊文献+

口外弓联合滑动杆与单纯口外弓远移“非汉字符号”的比较研究 被引量:2

A comparative study on distal movement of maxillary lst molar by facebow combining with sliding jig and facebow
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究口外弓结合滑动杆推上颌第一磨牙远移矫治安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形磨牙远移的变化量。方法  16例患者进行口外弓结合滑动杆与单纯口外弓推上颌第一磨牙远移的同体对照性研究 ,平均治疗 96 .37天 ,通过模型分析确定磨牙的移动量和扭转量。结果 口外弓结合滑动杆治疗侧磨牙均达安氏Ⅰ类关系 ,磨牙远移 3.0 0mm± 1.18mm ,而单纯口外弓治疗侧磨牙远移 0 .84mm± 0 .6 8mm(P <0 .0 1)。结论 口外弓结合滑动杆加速了磨牙远移的速度 ,同时兼有部分下颌磨牙的近中移动 ,加快了纠正磨牙安氏Ⅱ类牙合关系。 Objective To study the treatment of class Ⅱ malocclusion by face-bow combining with and facebow sliding-jig.Methods 16 patients of class Ⅱ malocclusion were treated by face-bow combining with sliding-jig on one side and face-bow only on the other side as the control.After treatment for 96.37 days,the molar movement and degree of rotation were measured and the data were documented.Results The first molar moved distally for 3.00 mm± 1.18 mm on the treated side and 0.84 mm± 0.68 mm on the control.There was significant difference between two sides(P< 0.01 ).Conclusion The velocity of molar distal movement by face-bow combining with sliding-jig and the mesial movement of the lower molars is accelorated,and the Angle Class Ⅱ malocclasion is corrected more guickly.
出处 《现代口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2002年第3期248-249,共2页 Journal of Modern Stomatology
关键词 Ⅱ类错He 口外弓 滑动杆 磨牙远移 治疗 正畸治疗 Class Ⅱ malocclusion Face-bow Sliding-jig Distal molar movement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

共引文献15

同被引文献13

  • 1刘汝平,段银钟.口内力远中移动上颌磨牙[J].口腔正畸学,2000,7(2):84-86. 被引量:12
  • 2杨振华,段银钟,刘红.拔除下颌第二磨牙后远移第一磨牙矫治骨性Ⅲ类错的研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2006,22(1):26-28. 被引量:19
  • 3Richmond S, Shaw WC, O' Brien KD, et ah The development of the PAR index : reliability and validty [J ]. Eur J Orthod, 1992,14(2):125.
  • 4Deguzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KWL, et al. The validation of peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficuhy [ J ] . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 107 (3) :172.
  • 5Feghali R, Nelson S, Hans MG. Comparing orthodontic treatment outcome of two geographically different clinic samples [ abstract][J ]. J Dent lies, 1997,76(12) : 1181.
  • 6Wenger R, Douangpanya S, Vig K, et al. Classes Ⅰ , Ⅱ and Ⅲ differcnces in severity, duration, and orthodontic results[ abstract ] [ J ].J Deul Res,1996,75(5):437.
  • 7Fox NA.The first 100 cases:a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating)index[J ]. Br Dent J, 1993,174(2) :290.
  • 8O' Brien KD, S haw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic severice of England and Wales[J ]. Br J Orthod, 1993,20(1) :25.
  • 9Schutze SF,Gedrange T,Zellmann MR,et al.Effects of unilateral molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2007
  • 10SfondriniMF,Cacciafesta V,Sfondrini G.Upper molar distaliza-tion:a critical analysis. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research . 2002

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部