期刊文献+

4种作物部分非叶器官气孔频度及其在光合作用中的意义(英文) 被引量:16

STOMATAL FREQUENCY ON SOME NON-LEAF ORGANS OF FOUR CROP SPECIES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对小麦 (TriticumaestivumL .)、大豆 (Glycinemax (L .)Merrill)、油菜 (BrassicanapusL .)和玉米 (ZeamaysL .)等 4种作物部分非叶器官 (油菜和大豆的豆荚 ;小麦的外稃和玉米的苞叶 )的气孔频度、气孔大小和气孔指数进行了比较研究。结果发现 ,上述作物非叶器官的气孔频度均较对应叶低 ;而气孔大小和气孔指数则变化较大。其中油菜和大豆非叶器官气孔的直径通常比对应叶大 ,小麦和玉米非叶器官的气孔直径则较小 ;大豆和油菜的非叶器官气孔指数比对应叶小 ,而玉米却较对应叶大。另外 ,还着重讨论了非叶器官的气孔频度对作物光合作用的影响 ,并提出了在非叶器官中可能存在与已知光合途径不同的光合类型。 The stomatal frequency, the guard-cell length and the stomatal index of non-leaf organs (pod of soybean and rape, lemma of wheat and husk leaf of corn) and leaves were investigated on four crops (Glycine max (L.) Merrill, Brassica napus L., Triticum aestivum L. and Zea mays L.). The results showed that stomatal frequency of non-leaf organs on four crops was significantly lower than that of leaves, whereas the guard-cell length and stomatal index varied greatly between leaves and non-leaf organs on these crops. The guard-cell length on the pod of soybean and rape was larger than that of their leaves. In both wheat and corn, the guard-cell lengths of non-leaf organs were smaller than those on leaves. The average values of the stomatal index in the non-leaf organs in these cultivars were smaller than that of leaves. In contrast, the stomatal index on non-leaf organs was bigger than that on leaves in corn. When evidence from physiological studies was incorporated. The significantly lower stomatal frequency in non-leaf organs suggested that non-leaf organs might use a different form of photosynthesis rather than being categorized within an existing C 3 or C 4 type.
出处 《植物生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第3期351-354,共4页 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
基金 StateKeyBasicResearchandDevelopmentPlan (No.G19980 10 10 0)andInnovativeGrantofChineseAcademyofSciences
关键词 作物 非叶器官 气孔频度 光合作用 小麦 大豆 油菜 玉米 Triticum aestivum L., Glycine max (L.) Merrill, Brassica napus L., Zea mays L., Non-leaf organs, Stomatal frequency, Photosynthetic type
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Blanke, M.M. & F. Lenz. 1989.Fruit photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment, 12: 31~46.
  • 2Brown, H. & F. Escombe. 1900. Static diffusion of gases and liquids in relationto the assimilation of carbon and translocation in plants. Philosophical Transactions ofthe Royal Society of London B, 193: 233~291.
  • 3Edwards, G. & D. Walker. 1983. C3, C4: mechanisms, and cellular andenvironmental regulation of photosynthesis. London: Blackwell Scientific Publication. 484~488.
  • 4Ferris, R.A.1991. Study of stomatal parameters in Plantago lanceolata L., Acerpseudoplatanus L. and Sesleria caerulea L. Msc. Thesis of University of Durham.
  • 5Imaizumi, N., H. Usuda, H. Nakamoto & K. Ishihara. 1990. Changes in the rate ofphotosynthesis during grain filling and the enzymatic activities associated with thephotosynthetic carbon metabolism in rice panicles. Plant and Cell Physiology, 31:835~845.
  • 6Imaizumi, N., M. Samejima & K. Ishihara. 1997. Characteristics ofphotosynthetic carbon metabolism of spikelets in rice. Photosynthesis Research, 52: 75~82.
  • 7Ishihara, K., A. Takada & N. Imaizumi. 1991. On the contribution of paniclephotosynthesis to grain yield in rice plants. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 60 (extraIssue 1):122~123.
  • 8Kousaka, F., O. Ueno & K. Ishihara. 1992. Inner fine structure of lemmas andpaleae of rice plant in relation to photosynthetic function. Japanese Journal of CropScience, 61 (Extra Issue 2): 175~176.
  • 9Price, D.N. & C.L. Hedley. 1980. Developmental and varietal comparisons of podcarboxylase levels in Pisum sativum L. Annals of Botany, 45:283~294.
  • 10Salisbury, E.J. 1927. On the causes and ecological significance of stomatalfrequency with special reference to woodland flora. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London B, 216: 1~65.

同被引文献300

引证文献16

二级引证文献158

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部