期刊文献+

硬膜外连续泵入罗比卡因与芬太尼用于30例分娩镇痛的临床观察 被引量:2

Clinical Observation of Continuous Epidural Infusion with Ropivacaine and Fent anyl to Relieve Pain of Labor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察罗比卡因复合芬太尼硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床效果。方法:美国麻醉医师协会分级法Ⅰ级60例产妇随机分为镇痛组和对照组。镇痛组在宫口开至2cm时,硬膜外穿刺接病人自控电子镇痛泵。镇痛药物为0.1%罗比卡因+芬太尼(1μg/ml)。注药速度为5ml/h,冲击量为2ml,锁定时间为10min。观察镇痛前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和改良Bromage评分,并记录产程时间、宫缩时间、宫缩间隔、催产素用量及新生儿Apgar评分。结果:硬膜外镇痛产妇生命体征平稳,镇痛后VAS评分明显降低(P<0.05),镇痛组第一产程缩短,对新生儿无不良影响。结论:罗比卡因复合芬太尼硬膜外分娩镇痛效果确切,对运动神经阻滞轻微,对新生儿无影响,是一较好的分娩镇痛方法。 Objective:To study the efficacy of epidural infusion with ropivaca ine combined with fentanyl on pain relief.Methods:Sixty parturients at labor we re randomly divided into analgesic group and control group.When cervix had opene d about 2 cm the patients of analgesic group were given continuous infusion of 0 .1%ropivacaine and fentanyl (1 μg/ml) on the speed of 5 ml every hour,at firs t 2 ml bolus,the total time of infusion was 10 min.The period of labor,the tim e of uterine contraction,the interval of uterine contraction,VAS,labor mode, amount of oxytocin and the Apgar score of neonatal were recorded at each labor p rocess.Results:There was no change of vital manifestation in analgesic group af ter epidural infusion. The scores of VAS wewe significantly lower than the contr ol(P< 0.05).There were no differences in neonatal Apgar scores between the two groups.The first stage of labour in analgesic group was shorter than the contol.Conclusion :Epidural infusion with ropivacaine and fentanyl is highly effective and the bl ock of motor never was slight.There was no influence of epidural infusion in the neonatals.The epidural infusion with ropivacaine and fentanyl is a good procedu re to relieve the pain of labour.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第3期237-239,共3页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
关键词 分娩 镇痛 麻醉 硬膜外 罗比卡因 芬太尼 labor analgesia anesthesia,epidural ropivacaine fentanyl
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献4

共引文献206

同被引文献14

  • 1陈健华,刘军,张爱思,余莉,朱晓燕.剖宫产术者人口学特征分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(9):1116-1117. 被引量:6
  • 2汤晓芙,卢祖能.内科疾病合并周围神经病[J].临床神经病学杂志,1996,9(2):121-123. 被引量:4
  • 3龚耀先.修订艾森克个性问卷手册[M].长沙:湖南科技出版社,1983.1-49.
  • 4Bader AM, Dattas B, Flanagan H, et al. Comparision of bupivacaineand bupivacaine-induced conduction blocked in the isolated rabbit vagus nervelsl[J]. Anesth Analg, 1989, 68(5) :724 -727.
  • 5Brockway MS, Bannister J, McClure JH, et al. Comparision of ropivacaine and bupivacaine[ J ]. Br J of Anesthesia, 1991,66( 11 ) :31 -37.
  • 6Rhi Saisto,Katariina Salmela-Aro,Jari-Erik Nurmi,et al.A ran-domized controlled.trial of intervention in fear of childbirth[J].Obstetric & Gynecology,2001,323(7322):1142-1143
  • 7Folkman S,Lazarus RS.Dunamics of a stressful encounter.congnitive appraisal,coping,and encounter outcomes[J].J of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,50(5):992-1003
  • 8Adams RD,Victor M.Priciples of neurology[M].5th.New York:Megraw Hill Inc,1993:960-1290
  • 9Kitamura T,Shima S,Sugawara M,et al.Psychological and Social correlates of the onset of affective disorders among pregnant women[J].Psychology Med,1993,23:967-975
  • 10Eddleston JM,Holland TJ,Griffin RP,et al.A doubleblind comparision of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labor[J].Br J Anaesth,1996,76:66-71

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部