4Dodgson, M. and Bessant, J. (1996) . Effective Innovation Policy: A new approach,London: International Thomson Business Press.
5Hamel, G. arid Prahalad, C.K. (1994) . Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
6Panda, H. and Ramanathan, K. (1996) . Technological capability assessment of a finn in the electricity sector. Technovation. 16. 10, 561-588.
7Prahalad, C.K. and Gary Hamel (1990) . The Cote Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, May- June, 79-93.
8Ramanathan, K. (1997) . An Eclectic Classification of "Feehnological Capability. Proceedings of the Consultative Meeting on Technology Management Education and Training for Developing Countries in the ESCAP Region, 19-22 May, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
9Sharif, M.N. (1994) . Technology Change Management: Imperatives for Developing Economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 47, 2, 1994, 103-114.
10Stalk, G., Evans, P. and Shulman, L. (1992) . Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, April-May, 57-69.
3George stalk Wtalk, Philip Evans, and Lawrence E. Shulman: Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy, Havard Business Review, March-April 1992,P57-69.
4C.K.Prahalad and Gary Hamel. The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June 1990,P81.
5B. Wernerfelt, A Resource -Based View of the firm, Strategic Management Journal 5, 1984,P171-180.
6Richard L.Priem and John E. Bulter, Is the resource-based "view" a useful Perspeetive for strategic management research? , the Academy of Management Review, Jan 2001 ,P22-40.
