期刊文献+

极低出生体重儿外周静脉导入中心静脉导管与细菌感染的相关性分析 被引量:1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCUTANEOUS CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS IN VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTS AND BACTERIA INFECTION
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨极低出生体重儿(VLBW)外用静脉导入中心静脉导管(PCVC)与细菌感染的相关性,对43倒置入中心静脉导管的VLBW和75例经外周静脉穿刺的VLBW,进行回顾性分析。结果显示:8例VLBW发生1次或1次以上细菌感染,感染率为18.6%(8/43)。其中,6例感染病例成功治疗后保留导管,2例治疗后无效拔管。对相关细菌感染的高危因素进行综合分析,并应用Logistic回归分析法得出PCVC应用不是细菌感染的独立高危因素(比值比和95%可信区间分别为0.5,0.21~2.72),机械通气时间和静脉输脂肪乳时间(比值比和95%见可信区间分别为2.2,1.43~7.96和4.7,2.98~9.86)为细菌感染独立高危因素。因此,认为PCVC作为长期提供静脉营养的基本途径,可以在感染的VLBW继续保留导管,延长PCVC的使用时间。 To investiagte the relationship between percutaneous central venous catheters in very low birth weight infants and bacteria infection, a retrospective study was carried out comparing 43 VLBW with percutaneous central venous catheters with 75 VLBW managed with peripheral cannulae. Results showed eight infants developed one or more episodes of bacteria infection, incidence of infection was 18.6% (8/43), 6 cases of infection were sucessfully treated with reserving catheters, and 2 cases were removed their catheter. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine risk factors for bacteraemia, PCVC was not an independent risk factor (odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence limits 0.21 ~ 2.72) , The duration of ventilation and intravenous lipids were both significant risks for infaction ( odds ratios and 95% . confidence lim-its2.2, 1.43 ~ 1.96 and 4.7, 2.98 ~ 9.86 respectively ) . Therefore, PCVC can act as the primary route for prolonged administration of total parenteral nutrition, catheters may be retained VLBW even they are infected.
出处 《新生儿科杂志》 2002年第3期97-100,共4页 The Journal of Neonatology
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1希罗华特.血培养分离出凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的阳性预测值[J].国外医学:儿科学分册,1996,23(5):267-267.

同被引文献13

  • 1[4]Mukau L,Talamim MA,Sitzmann JV,et al. Long-tern cemtrl venous access vs other home therapies:complications in patients with acquired im munodeficiency syndrome [J].JPEN,1992, 16:455
  • 2[5]Miller KD,Dietrick CL. Experience with PICC at a University Medical Center[J]. Journal of Intravenous Nursing, 1997,20: 141~147
  • 3[6]Andrusk ofurphy K. Special issue on outcomes in infusion Opivita[J]. Newsletter, 1998 : 3~ 4
  • 4[8]Janes M,Kalyn A,Pinelli J,et al. A randomized trial comparing Peripherally inserted central venous cathers with peripheral Intravenous catheters in infants very with birth weight[J]. J Pediatr Surg,2000,35(7) : 1 040
  • 5[10]Keuns PJ,Cdeman S,Wehner JH. Complication of long Arm-cathetrs : A Randomzied Trial of central vs peripheral Tip Location[J]. Jouranl of parenferat and Enteral Natrition,1995,20:20~24
  • 6[11]Mazzol AR,Schott-Baer D, Adey L, et al. Clinieal factors associated with the development of phlebitis after insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter [J].J Intraven Nurs,1999 22(1):36~42
  • 7[12]Un-yan Yeung,Hung-chang Lee. Sepsis during total parenteral nutrition: exploration of risk factors and determination of the effectivenes of peripherally inserted central venous catheters[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 1998,17:135~142
  • 8[14]Cairns PA,Wilson DC,Mc Clure BG,et al. Percutaneous central Venous catheter use in the very low birth weight neonate[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 1995,154:145
  • 9[1]Soong WJ,Jeng MJ,Hwang B. The evaluation of percutaneous central venous catheters-aconvenient technique in pediatric patients [J]. Intensive care Med, 1995,21: 759 ~765
  • 10[2]Abi-Nader JA. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in cntical care patients[J]. Haeretq Lung, 1993,22:428~433

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部