4Capar ID,Arslan H,Akcay M,et aI.An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaperNext, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.J Endod,2014;40(10):1638-1641.
5Madarati AA.Temperature rise on the surface of NiTi and stainless steel fractured instruments during ultrasonic removal.lnt Endod J,2014.doi: 10,1111/iej,12383. [Epub ahead of print].
6B0rklein S,Mathey D,Schfer E.Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.lnt Endod J,2014.doi: 10,1111/iej,12375.[Epub ahead of print].
7Capar ID,Arslan H,Akcay M,et al.Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin.J Endod,2014;40(9):1482-1484.
8Prez-Higueras JJ,Arias A,de la Macorra JC,et al.Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels.J Endod. 2014;40(9): 1477-1481.
9Giuliani V, Di Nasso L,Pace R,et al.Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion. J Endod,2014; 40(9): 1468-1471.
10Alves FR,Ribeiro TO,Moreno JO,et al.Comparison of the efficacy of nickel-titanium rotary systems with or without the retreatment instruments in the removal of gutta-percha in the apical third.BMC Oral Health,2014;14:102.
