摘要
《金瓶梅词话》第 5 3～ 5 7回中 ,除第 5 4回后半回外 ,其余四回半确为江浙一带读书人补入。大体说来 ,第 5 4回“应伯爵郊园会诸友”为一人所写 ,第 5 3、5 5、5 6、5 7回为另一人所补。补入者的叙事能力远不及原作者那样细腻老辣 ,且补写较为匆忙。
Chapters 53-57 in Plum in Gold Vase were added by scholars in Jiangsu and Zhejiang with only half chapter of them as exception.Chapter 54 Meeting Friends in Suburban Garden was writeen by one person while the rest by another person.Their writing ability was not as good as the original author's,and they did their job in a hurry.There are at least three major plots which are not in conformity with the original work.
出处
《河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2002年第2期66-70,共5页
Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
真伪
叙事逻辑
补作者
探佚
三大情节
《金瓶梅词话》
true and false
narrative logic
additionl authors
trace to source
three major plots
