摘要
关于宋玉《舞赋》的问题 ,历来学者大多视其为伪托之作 ,认定其是对傅毅《舞赋》的“简节其词”。本文驳斥了这一观点 ,分别以对汉赋、傅毅赋的模仿创作方式的寻根溯源 ,对宋玉《舞赋》与傅毅《舞赋》的比较研究 ,以及对作为认定宋玉《舞赋》乃“伪托之作”的所谓铁证《艺文类聚》的可信度的质疑 ,来考证宋玉《舞赋》并非“伪托之作” ,而理应是宋玉亲作。
There are some problems concerning Song Yus 'Dancing Fu'.All through the ages many scholars have invariably insisted that it should have forged ancient literary works, maintaining it was an act of plagiarism from Fu Yis 'Dancing Fu'. This article refutes the above-mentioned point of view, seeking for the roots separately between 'Han Fu' and 'Fu Yis Fu',their mode of imitation and creation. In comparison with Song Yus 'Dancing Fu' and Fu Yis 'Dancing Fu' and by means of querying the validity of the so-called 'evidence',i.e.'A Collection of Arts and Literature, the author concludes it was written by Song Yu himself, not plagiarized.
出处
《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2002年第4期19-22,共4页
Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)