摘要
在刑事司法和审判实践中 ,聚众斗殴罪是颇具争议的热点问题之一。对聚众斗殴罪的犯罪主体 ,应视情况不同区别对待 ,应区分其作用大小 ,按责论罪。对犯罪嫌疑人供述、司法机关尚未掌握的由聚众斗殴行为转化而来的故意伤害或故意杀人罪行可否认定自首 ,关键在于明确“同种罪行”的确切内涵。在定罪量刑上 ,要切实把握立法本旨。区分聚众斗殴罪与寻衅滋事罪、故意伤害罪 ;不容忽视斗殴行为的对偶性 ;
The crime of affray is hard to define in the process of trial. The accused in different cases should be dealt in different ways and the penalty should be based on the criminal action. The true meaning of kindred offense can help determine whether the criminal suspect(s) should be accepted as surrender(s) when intentional killing or injury has resulted from affray. When determining the guilt and exercising the penalty, it is necessary to find out the differences between affray and intentional injury and to use the theory of joint offence if possible.
出处
《南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》
2002年第2期55-60,86,共7页
Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics(Social Sciences)
关键词
聚众斗殴
首要分子
自首
定罪量刑
Affray
Ring leader
Voluntary Surrender
Adjudgement and Sentence