关于《诗品序》与《诗品》价值取向的差异问题——兼辨“子卿双凫”与“谢客山泉”无误

About Value Difference in Shi Pin Xu and Shi Pin

同一作者在同一书的正文与序文中 ,对同一研究对象若所取的角度有异 ,其价值取向便随之而或有差异。《诗品序》与《诗品》之间的情形即如此。以品文不列而序文及之为非 ,虽极合我们之理 ,却未必符仲伟之“规”。“子卿”之本为“子卿” ,要比原作“少卿”有据可信。“谢客”与“灵运”重出 ,虽不好理解 ,但至少 ,“谢客”之为“谢客” ,比以为这是“谢朓”或“谢庄”或“谢瞻”

If from different perspective, value difference sometimes emerges in the study of the same object by the same writer in the text and the prelude of the same book, which is true of Shi Pin Xu and Shi Pin. Though we think it reasonable, it may not accord with Zhong Wei's 'rule', to consider it improper to discuss something not in the text proper but in the prelude. It is more credible to take 'Zi Qing' for 'Zi Qing' than for 'Shao Qing'. The appearance of 'Xie Ke' and 'Ling Yun' may add difficulty to understanding, but to take 'Xie Ke' for 'Xie Ke' is more credible than for 'Xie Zhao', 'Xie Zhuang', 'Xie Zhan' or somebody else.