期刊文献+

论“安乐死”的构成要素及道德冲突——基于医疗领域内对人的生命的一种医疗干预 被引量:3

Euthanasia" Inscapes and Ethical Conflicts ——as a medical interference in human's life in the medical field
下载PDF
导出
摘要 严格意义上的“安乐死”即法律上应予以合法化的“安乐死” ,是指在医疗领域发生的 ,由医护人员来实施的 ,由疾病患者所要求并且由疾病患者来承担的 ,旨在无痛苦地解除患者痛苦并且该目的之实现在技术和操作上是可行的一种人为致人死亡的死亡实施或死亡过程。“安乐死”之所以为社会所广泛关注和争议 ,除了“安乐死”在具体实施方面的有关困难和风险之外 ,就是因为它必然地涉及各种尖锐复杂的伦理关系 。 Euthanasia, especially euthanasia connected with the law, has been a public concern in Europe and North America and other developed countries since 1960's. And it had remained a great controversial issue in the Mainland of China in the 1980's owing to the Euthanasia Case of Hanzhong, in Shaanxi Province. Now, the phenomena or the problems of euthanasia are often discussed or reported in the media in China such as newspapers, magazines, internet, radio, TV and so on. In the broad sense, euthanasia means 'to die serenely and painlessly' or 'serene and painless dying technology'. In other words, it means 'a gentle and painless death for a person' or 'bringing about of a gentle and painless death to a person'. In most countries and regions, it is against the law for doctors or others to practice euthanasia. And strictly speaking, in our opinion, euthanasia which should be recognized by the law of a nation is carrying death into execution or dying process that happens in the medical field and assisted by medical staff because patients demand it and promise to bear it. The aim is to painlessly relieve their pains and the precondition is the feasibility in technology and operation. The death undertaker and enforcer and concrete dying operation procedures should all meet corresponding regulations. Euthanasia causes comprehensive social attention and controversies. Besides being difficult and risky in its concrete implementation, it is inevitably involved in various, complex ethical relations, and is engaged in values conflicts of universal mankind morality.
作者 林桂榛 陈瑛
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第3期87-94,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词 安乐 安乐死 构成要素 承担主体 实施主体 操作程序 道德冲突 death gentle and painless euthanasia inscapes undertaker, enforcer, operation procedures moral conflicts
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1A.P. Cowie. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English: Fouth edition[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • 2陆莉娜,朱宗涵.高新科技在医学领域的应用:上册[M].北京:长征出版社,1999.
  • 3翟晓梅.安乐死的概念问题[J].自然辩证法通讯,2000,22(3):86-93. 被引量:23
  • 4Martin Gunderson, David J. Mayo. Altruism and Physician Assisted Death [ J ]. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1993,18(3) :281 - 295.
  • 5NicolaBourbaki.Living High and Letting Die[J].Philosophy,2001,76(297):435-442.
  • 6张田勘.对安乐死立法难的思考[J].山东医科大学学报(社会科学版),1998,12(1):37-40. 被引量:23
  • 7亚里士多德.尼各马科伦理学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1990.226.
  • 8邱仁宗.生命伦理学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1987.175.
  • 9陈仁彪,高志炎,丘祥兴.迎接21世纪的医学伦理学——记中欧医学伦理学国际学术研讨会[J].医学与哲学,2000,21(3):61-64. 被引量:5

二级参考文献3

  • 1邱仁宗.生命伦理学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1987.175.
  • 2卓小勤 邱仁宗.安乐死的定义与界限-关于安乐死的本体论研究.全国首届安乐死:社会、伦理和法律问题学术讨论会文集[M].,.8-9.
  • 3陈浩文 高永文(中国香港).宛乐死的谬误、医疗目标与患者自决权.价值与社会(第一集)[M].北京:中国科学社会出版社,1997,8..

共引文献126

同被引文献24

  • 1陈霆宇.安乐死几个相关问题探析[J].政法论丛,1998(2):53-56. 被引量:14
  • 2邵俊武.论医疗纠纷民事诉讼的若干问题[J].政治与法律,2002(3):46-53. 被引量:9
  • 3朱苏力.法治及其本土资源[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996..
  • 4邱仁宗.生命伦理学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1987..
  • 5最高人民法院.中国应用法学研究所编.人民法院案例选[M].北京:人民法院出版社,1992.
  • 6路易斯·波伊曼.生与死-现代道德困境的挑战[M].江丽美译.台湾:桂冠图书股份有限公司,1995:67-68.
  • 7戴维·M·沃克.牛津法律大词典[M].北京:光明日报出版社,1988.
  • 8新法律学辞典[M].董璠舆等译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1991:10.
  • 9于主刚.刑法问题与争鸣[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2002.
  • 10J·P·蒂洛.伦理学理论与实践[M].孟庆时等译.北京:北京大学出版社,1985.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部