摘要
在T1 0 6中期数值预报模式和T6 3气候模式中进行了两种辐射过程参数化的对比试验。目前在这两个模式中用作对照积分的辐射方案 (OPE)是ECMWF的早期业务方案 ,而新的辐射方案 (NEW )是ECMWF 1 989年 5月 2日成为业务的版本。试验结果表明 ,OPE高估了短波水的吸收 ,导致太大的短波大气吸收和地表太小的向下短波辐射 ;OPE还低估了长波辐射冷却和大气顶的向外长波辐射 (OLR) ;NEW增加了地表有效辐射能量和对流层总的冷却 ,产生了较大的湍流热通量 ,对流活动加强 ,降水量明显增加 ;NEW还使平流层温度偏暖得到矫正。业务平行试验的统计检验表明 ,NEW对 4~
A comparison of two radiation parameterization schemes has been carried out in the T106 Medium-range NWP model and the National Climate Center's climate model T63. The radiation scheme used for the control integration in the two models at present was the original ECMWF operational radiation scheme (OPE), and the new radiation scheme (NEW) was the version that became operational on May 2, 1989 in ECMWF. Results indicate that OPE overestimates the short-wave water absorptivity, which leads to too large short-wave atmospheric absorption and too small downward short-wave radiation at the surface; OPE also underestimates the long-wave radiative cooling and the outgoing long-wave radiation at the top of atmosphere (OLR). In NEW the radiative energy available at the surface and an overall cooling of the troposphere increase; large turbulent heat fluxes are generated; the convective activity is enhanced; and the precipitation clearly increases. The warm temperature bias in the stratosphere in OPE is corrected. The operational parallel statistical test indicates a more pronounced improvement to the medium-range forecast of 4-7 days.
出处
《应用气象学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2002年第3期299-311,共13页
Journal of Applied Meteorological Science
基金
中国气象局气候研究开放课题
国家气象中心ZX95 0 1 0 4课题
国家"十五"科技攻关项目 :"中国气象数值系统技术创新研究"课题共同资助